Skip to content

India Financial Consultancy

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Media
    • Publications
    • Press Releases
    • Newsletters
    • Archives
  • Contact Us
August 24, 2024 / Business Set Up in India

Guide on Pvt Ltd Company Registration Process in India

company Registration

How many types of business in IndiaHow many types of business in India

Guide on Pvt Ltd Company Registration Process

  • Creating a company in India is an essential first step on your path to entrepreneurship. And establishing a company is not as simple as you would think.
  • There are procedures to follow and documents to submit, of course, but once you understand how to do them, the entire company registration process will go rather smoothly and fast. Continue reading to discover how to simply register a private limited company!

What is the Minimum needs for Company formation Process?

The four requirements for registering a private limited company in India are mentioned below before we go on to the company registration procedure in India.

Indian Registered office address in India.

  • Companies should have their RO (Registered office) in India but company have option of among residential or commercial property either of the two as a Registered Office Address

Unique business name

  • Entrepreneurs give a lot of consideration to the name of their company. But, they must ensure that it is sufficiently unique. The name must also include a suffix that defines the company’s line of business, like as MotherPride daily Fruit & Vegetable Pvt Ltd. The company deals with dairy products, vegetables & fruits just by looking at the name.

Minimum Two shareholders

  • Shareholders might be a person or Company or organization. In the case of a Company entity, a Nominated person via authorised representative is qualified to act in the capacity of a shareholder on behalf of the company.

Minimum Two directors

  • According to the Companies Act of 2013, one director must be an Indian resident who has resided there continuously for at least a year (as recently amended). One more might be a resident who is foreign or Indian.

What is list of document Checklist for company Registration?

You are finding here list of all documents of shareholders/ directors that are needed to Company register in India.

For Indian Nationals

  • Aadhar Card Copy
  • Identity of Directors & members (Passport/Driving License/ Voter ID) must be Self-Attested Proof
  • Copy of PAN card all the Directors and members must be Self-Attested.
  • Address proof which must be in the Director or shareholder name (i.e Telephone Bill/Electricity Bill/ Mobile Bill/Latest Bank A/c Statement showing name & address along with the last page of transaction with recent activities) which required be Self-Attested.
  • Photograph i.e Passport size

In case Foreign Country person

In the case of a foreign shareholder/ director, below documents must be apostilled & notarized.

  • Foreign national subscribers required to give their passport as proof of nationality
  • Photograph i.e Passport size
  • Foreign national address proof including, Bank Statement/ Driving License/electricity/utility bill which must not be older than two months

What is documents needed for Company Registered address for Office?

  • Rent Agreement copy if rented property
  • NOC Certificate from Property owner.
  • Company business proof of address (Water Bill/Gas Bill/ Electricity Bill/Telephone Bill) must not older than last two months.

Company incorporation process- Simplifying here under :

According to the Companies Act, 2013, the MCA governs the incorporation of a Private limited Company registration.  It is focused on making sure that laws and regulations adhere to company law. . MCA Registration form fees depend upon two factors i.e, Stamp Duty and Normal Form filing fees. The minimal incorporation expenses for Private Limited Firm registration are necessary because Stamp Duty varies depending on authorised capital and the state in which the company is incorporated. Rajput Jain & Associates assists business owners in establishing a private limited company in just 4 simple steps:

Pvt Ltd Company Registration Process.

The Four step process begins with the application for a DSC & filing SPICe+ forms. Now we Let’s go step by step process !

Step-1:  Applying for Directors DSC

  • All Director & shareholder of a Pvt Ltd C. required to take a DSC as per the MCA. This Digital Signature Certificate will be used on all the documents for filing the e-forms in a secured manner, as per guidance issued by “Information Technology Act”.
  • 1st step is to acquire Digital Signature Certificate to File online documents securely. Digital Signature Certificate is get from the Controller of Certification Agencies (CCA). The minimum validity is one year. But, 1 can extend the validity to two years.

All Applicant needs to furnish the following individual details for applying for DSC:

  • Photographs i.e. Passport-size
  • Aadhaar Card No
  • Mobile/Phone No.
  • E-mail Address
  • Permanent Account No

In case 1 or more shareholders or directors are foreign country nationals, they required apostilled and notarized documents will also be needed.

Step-2: Applying for Company Name Reservation (SPICe+ Part A)

  • We shall have apply some name options for company. We needed to chose best 2 to submit in MCA SPICe+ Part A form, which is normally used to reserve a unique Name of company for our new Pvt LTD Company. We should require help of professionals practising CA/ CS to fill out & file SPICe+ Part A form. In this case firstly we should go, We can pick two options of Company name.

SPICe+ Part A form has the mention following option’s:

  • Type of Company:We needed to Select ‘Pvt Ltd Co.’ from various kind of company structures listed down in the MCA form. Other type of business structures include Section 8 Company, IFSC Company, Producer Company, Nidhi Company, Unlimited Company etc.
  • Class of Company:This section key significant whether a company is private, public, or one person company. We have to choose ‘private’.
  • Category of Company:Select if you’d want the company to be limited by shares, by guarantee or have unlimited shares. Important popular is to keep the limited by shares company.
  • Sub-category of Company: select the sub-category applicable with help of CA / CS practising professional.
  • Industrial Activity main division:what industry will we be operating in? Ministry of Corporate Affairs has designated distinguishing codes to the main divisions. Select one that fits for our company business with help of CA or CS Practising professional.
  • Main division Description: This is where we can clarify our Company business idea, & specify main purpose of services or products that we are going to offer to our client in a detailed manner.
  • Proposed Company name:We can propose two names so which we like to keep as our name of company.

And done! After filed, Ministry of Corporate Affairs will take two or three days to get approve SPICe+ Part A form. In case initial names get questioned or rejected, We will get a 2nd chance to submit for two more name of company options of our liking.

In case all your 4 name choices get rejected, you will need to file the SPICe+ Part A form all over again. Pro Tip: Come up with very unique brand name choices & check company name availability beforehand. Before filing the form, we should check if a company with a similar name is already registered or not on the Ministry of Corporate Affairs portal.

After names of Company approved by Ministry of Corporate Affairs, SPICe+ Part B form will be made available to you to furthermore with our company registration process.

Step-3: Submit details for the Proposed Company (SPICe+ Part B)

SPICe+ Part B form is where you fill in the key details about business & Company. We needed to make sure all details are provided to practising professional CA / CS correctly. SPICe+ Part B required to be filed in eight parts:

  • Capital Details:
  • Registered Office Address:
  • Subscriber and Directors’ details:
  • Stamp Duty:
  • TAN & PAN Application:
  • Require Attachments: like a utility bill, identity & residential address proof of the 1st director & shareholder, director consent & No Objection Certificate from owner of the registered address etc.
  • Necessary declaration: DSC to declare that we follow guidelines of the Companies Act 2013.
  • Required declaration & Certificate by Professional: Lastly SPICe+ Part B form, the CA, CS, or CMA practicing professionals helping us out with company formation registration process will be needed to give their DSC.

Step 4: Drafting and filing of MCA Registration Form

  • An Registration Form will be drafted & filed as per the significant clauses of SPICe+ Memorandum of Association(MOA) by the CA in practicing. Let’s understand clauses quickly & briefly.

SPICe+ Memorandum of Association (MOA):

  • Company Name clause: we required to disclose pic company name & use of word “Pvt/ Private Limited” after Name of company.
  • The Company Capital clause: Company authorized capital & share capital of company is required to be disclose.
  • Liability clause: Under the liability clause determines that Company shareholder member’s liability is limited by shares.
  • Company Subscriber clause: We required to state details of the first subscribed/shareholder & No of subscribed shares.
  • Registered office clause: Under Registered office clause identifies Indian state where we have to company registered.
  • Company Object clause: This is an important company clause as you required to mention main object- that is we idea to deal with the Company business activities.

After above clause is added, Proposed subscribers of company & CA/ CS professionals affix the Digital Signature Certificate to submit with the Ministry of Corporate Affairs for approval.

SPICe+ Articles of Association (AOA):

Then comes the SPICe+ AOA (Articles of Association)

SPICe+ AOA give below information correctly to be submitted in the Table F of the company:

  • Clause 1: The interpretation of your company
  • Clause 60: Mention the company details
  • Company Name is auto filled

SPICe+ AOA ROC form also state responsibility & power of the management decisions, director, dividend policy, transfer of shares & many other significant information related to structure of company.

Similar as Memorandum of Association, the CA/ CS professionals affix their own Digital Signature Certificate as well as Companies director’s Digital Signature Certificate to file  with Ministry of Corporate Affairs for approval.

AGILE-PRO-S

  • AGILE-PRO-S form is also significant phase in the formation of a company process.It must be provided in order to register a GST number, EPFO (Employees Provident Fund Organization) credentials, and ESIC information (Employee State Insurance Corporation). You must also inform the bank account and shop and establishment licence, depending on the state where your company is registered. All the above can be done with a professional’s help.
  • After completion of above ROC forms,INC-9 will be issue automatically as a declaration of ROC form
  • Finally, After above process is done, ROC Challan is to be paid along with ROC Stamp duty & Govt Charges. If there are no objection or rejected generated by ROC, MCA issue Certificate of Incorporation (COI).

Certificate of Incorporation

Guide on Pvt Ltd Company Registration Process

  • The MCA issues the Certificate of Incorporation after carefully verifying your application and the accompanying paperwork.
  • When the company’s incorporation date, Company Identification Number (CIN), PAN, and TAN are mentioned along with the Registrar’s signature and seal, it is irrefutable evidence of the company’s existence. Furthermore, directors are given DINs upon registration approval.
  • The Certificate of Incorporation  mention CIN receipt acts as adequate evidence of your company’s legitimacy & you are now free to engage in the commercial activity you had planned.

PAN AND TAN after co incorporation

Post Registration Compliances

Post Registration Compliances

Compliances are one of the things that need to be done once the firm is incorporated so that business owners can concentrate on their key functions. Furthermore, it assists companies in establishing a proper structure that outlines the responsibilities of shareholders and directors. Read more about how Rajput Jain and Associates’ professionals and subject matter experts assist new businesses with managing post-registration compliances.

This effectively summarises the company registration process. We hope that by now you have a better understanding of how to set up a private limited company in India and are prepared to start your own company. You can submit a query using the form below if you need more clarification or assistance. We would be delighted to participate in your innovative project.

May 16, 2024 / TDS

FAQs TDS on Purchases (Section 194Q)

FAQs TDS on Purchases (Section 194Q)

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) TDS on Purchases (Section 194Q)

Q.: Who is subject to the Section 194Q tax deduction?

A purchaser carrying on a business whose total sales, gross revenue, or turnover from the business exceeds Rs. 10 crores for the financial year immediately preceding the financial year in which such items are purchased is entitled to deduct the tax under Section 194Q. This clause will take effect on July 1, 2021.

Thus, if the purchaser’s turnover was more than Rs. 10 crores in the financial year 2020-21, the purchaser will be liable to deduct tax under this provision in the financial year 2021-2022.

Q.: Is this true for all types of assesses, such as individuals and businesses?

The provisions apply to all types of assessees who meet the definition of buyer. There are currently no exclusions.

Q.:  Is it only applicable to goods or does it include services as well?

The new provision only applies to the purchase of goods, not services.

Q.: When does this provision require tax to be deducted?

If the following conditions are met, the tax will be deducted from the buyer’s purchases.

  • A resident person makes a purchase of goods.
  • In any previous year, goods were purchased for a value or aggregate value in excess of Rs. 50 lakhs.
  • The buyer should not be on the list of people who aren’t eligible for tax deductions.

If the tax is deductible or recoverable under any other provision save Section 206C, it cannot be deducted under this section (1H). If a transaction is subject to TCS under Section 206C(1H), the buyer is responsible for deducting the tax first. The seller will not be obligated to collect the tax under Section 206C if he does so (1H). Also, take a look at FAQ 5.

Q.:  When should tax deductions be taken into account?

Tax is required to be deducted at the time of crediting such sum to the seller’s account or at the time of payment by any mode, whichever comes first. Even if the money is credited to the ‘Suspense Account,’ the tax must be deducted.

Q.:  Is TDS required on the full consideration or only on the consideration that surpasses INR 50 lakhs if the consideration for the purchase of goods exceeds INR 50 lakhs?

Section 194Q, sub-section (1), requires the buyer to deduct tax at the time of purchase of goods. It provides for a tax deduction of 0.1 percent of the amount exceeding INR 50 lakh in a fiscal year.

As a result, if the consideration exceeds INR 50 lakh, the tax will be deducted at source. For example, if the first purchase was for INR 35 lakh and the second purchase was for INR 40 lakh, TDS should only be applied to the second purchase and only to the sum of INR 25 lakh (35 lakh + 40 lakh – 50 lakh). The INR 50 lakh limit will be applied year after year.

Q.: What is the tax rate that will be deducted?

If the seller has provided his PAN, the tax will be deducted at the rate of 0.1 percent of the purchase value exceeding Rs. 50 lakhs by the buyer of goods; otherwise, the tax will be deducted at the rate of 5%.

The 0.1 percent rate is subject to the fulfilment of the terms set forth in the newly introduced section 206AB of the Finance Act of 2021.

Q.: What are the 206AB terms and conditions?

In the Income Tax Act of 1961, a specific provision of TDS was established by the Finance Act of 2021. Section 206AB has been added, which will take effect on July 1, 2021.

This new rule mandates that when paying a ‘Specified person,’ TDS be deducted at the higher rate. The following would have increased TDS rates.

  1. At twice the rate set forth in the applicable Act provision.
  2. At twice the current rate or rates.
  3. At a rate of 5% per year.

Specified person:  A specified person is one who has

  1. failed to file income tax returns for both of the immediately preceding two years relevant to the year in which tax is due to be deducted or collected, as the case may be, and whose due date for filing such return has passed under Section 139(1).
  2. In each of the immediately preceding two years, his total tax deducted at source and tax collected at source was INR 50,000 or more.

A non-resident who does not have a permanent establishment in India is not considered a designated person.

This law does not apply to tax deductions at the source.

  • Section 192 – TDS on salary
  • TDS on payment towards an accumulated sum payable to an employee who participates in a recognised provident fund (‘PF’).
  • TDS on lottery or crossword puzzle winnings (Section 194B).
  • TDS on horse race winnings (Section 194BB).
  • TDS on income from a securitization trust investment under Section 194LBC.
  • TDS on cash withdrawals in excess of INR 20 lakhs (Section 194N).

Q.:  Who is responsible for tax deduction/collection when a transaction is covered by both TDS under Section 194Q and TCS under Section 206C(1H)?

The second clause to Section 206C(1H) states that if the buyer is required to deduct tax on goods purchased from the seller under any provision and has done so, no tax shall be obtained on the same transaction.

Section 194Q(5) states that if a person can deduct tax under another provision or if tax is collectable under section 206C [other than a transaction on which tax is collectible under Section 206C(1H)], no tax is required to be deducted under this provision.

Though Section 206C(1H) precludes a transaction from which tax is deducted under any other law (including Section 194Q), Section 194Q(5) does not offer a similar exclusion for a transaction from which tax is recoverable under Section 206C. (1H).

As a result, the buyer’s primary responsibility is to deduct the tax, and no tax will be collected on such a transaction under Section 206C. (1H). If the buyer defaults, however, the seller assumes responsibility for collecting the tax.

Both of these provisions are differentiated in the table below:

Particulars Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3
Turnover of Seller (In cr.) 12 6 12
Turnover of Buyer (In cr.) 6 12 12
Sale of goods (In cr.)                              (A) 2 2
Sales consideration paid during the year (In cr.)                                                  (B) 1 1 1
Who is liable to deduct or collect tax? Seller Buyer Buyer
Rate of Tax (Seller/Buyer has provided PAN and has satisfied section 206AB) 0.1% 0.1% 0.1%
Amount on which tax to be deducted or collected (In Cr.)

[Amount in excess of Rs. 50,00,000 is the taxable amount]

0.5

[(B) – 0.5]

1.5

[(A) – 0.5]

1.5

[(A) – 0.5]

Tax to be deducted or collected 5,000 15,000 15,000

Both the buyer and the seller may be unsure about who should deduct the tax. The purchaser retains the primary responsibility for deducting the tax. To avoid ambiguity, the buyer may provide the seller with a declaration stating that he will deduct the taxes at the time of booking the invoice or making the advance payment, as applicable.

The seller must provide a declaration stating how he has filed the ITR for the two preceding years as specified in section 206AB.

Q.:  Is a buyer importing goods from outside India required by this section to deduct tax at the source?

According to Section 194Q, every person who is a buyer and is responsible for paying any payment to any resident who is a seller is required to deduct tax at source. As a result, under this provision, the obligation to deduct tax arises only when the payment is made to a resident seller.

Because the supplier is a non-resident, the buyer is not required to deduct tax under this provision, as it is in the case of import. The buyer may obtain a declaration regarding the seller’s residential status. However, TDS under Section 195 or payment of the Equalisation Levy may be required in relation to such a transaction.

This exception may not apply in the case of a purchase of goods via a High Seas sales transaction because the High Seas seller may be a resident.

Q.:  Is it necessary to deduct tax from goods exported abroad under Section 194Q?

Under this provision, liability to deduct tax arises only when the payment is made to a resident seller. The residential status of the buyer making the payment is irrelevant under this provision.

As in a goods export transaction, the seller is a resident but the buyer is a non-resident. As a result, the non-resident buyer may be obligated to deduct tax under this provision.

However, determining whether all of the prerequisites of section 194Q, section 206AB, and the availability of PAN have been met is a time-consuming process. I hope that the CBDT and the government provide the necessary clarifications to improve the ease of doing business in India.

Q.:  What shall be construed as a purchase of goods in the lack of any definition of the term?

The Income-tax Act does not define the term “goods.” The phrase ‘goods’ has a broad definition. Anything that enters the market might be classified as a good. However, the Sale of Goods Act of 1930 and the Central Goods and Services Tax Act of 2017 define the term “goods.”

The following is a list of goods as defined by different legislation:

Particulars CGST Act, 2017 Customs Act, 1962 Sale of goods Act, 1930
Definition of Goods Every kind of movable property other than services Inclusive definition to cover all goods Every kind of movable property
Inclusions Actionable claims, crops, grass and things attached to land Vessels, stores, baggage, currency, negotiable instrument & other kind of movable property Stocks & shares, Crops, Grass and things attached to Land
Exclusions Money & Securities – Actionable claims & money

Q.:  Is a transaction in securities conducted through stock exchanges subject to TDS under this provision?

Concerns were raised about the applicability of Section 206C(1H) of the Finance Act of 2020, which provides for the collection of tax on the sale of goods, in transactions involving stock exchanges (or commodities exchanges), because there is no one-to-one contract between buyers and sellers.

In case of the case, the CBDT clarified in Circular No. 17 of 2020 that the provisions of Section 206C(1H) shall not apply to transactions in securities (and commodities) traded through recognized stock exchanges or cleared and settled by recognised clearing corporations, including recognised stock exchanges or recognised clearing corporations located in Internaional (IFSC).

Using the logic behind the clarification, it’s possible that the CBDT may provide a similar exemption from TDS under Section 194Q.

Q.:  Should TDS be deducted on capital goods purchases?

‘Goods,’ as defined in Question 10, refers to all types of movable property, subject to specified restrictions and inclusions, regardless of whether they are capital goods or not. As a result, TDS will be deducted on capital goods purchases as well.

Q.:  Is TDS deducted if the buyer is in the service industry and buys items from a seller?

The concept of buyer is described in section 194Q’s explanation. Buyer means a person whose total sales, gross receipts, or turnover from the business he runs exceed ten crore rupees in the financial year immediately preceding the fiscal year in which the goods are purchased.

The term “business” is defined broadly in Section 2(13) of the Income Tax Act of 1961. “Any trade, commerce, or manufacture, or any adventure or concern in the nature of trade, commerce, or manufacture, is considered a business.” As a result, we can conclude that business includes services, and if the buyer is a service provider, he must deduct TDS on the purchase of goods if all other conditions are met.

Q.: Is TDS to be deducted on a developer’s purchase of immovable property?

According to Question 12, “goods” refers to any type of movable property subject to certain exceptions and inclusions.

As a result, immovable property is not treated as ‘goods.’ As a result, the TDS under section 194Q shall not be deducted from a developer’s purchase of immovable property.

Q.: Is it required to deduct TDS from an electrical transaction?

A transaction in electricity can be completed by purchasing directly from a company that generates electricity or by using power exchanges. The CBDT has stated that electricity, renewable energy certificates, and energy-saving certificates exchanged through power exchanges authorised under Regulation 21 of the CERC are not subject to TCS under Section 206C (1H).

Applying the reason for this, it is concluded that, under Section 194Q, the CBDT may permit a similar exemption from TDS.

Q.: Should TDS be deducted when purchasing software?

The taxation of software has long been a source of contention under the Income-tax Laws. In the absence of any guidelines in the Income-tax Act, such classification has always been a source of contention. The Finance Act of 2012 included clarification amendments in Section 9 to broaden the scope of royalty taxation. The amendment clarifies that the consideration for the use or right to use computer software is a royalty.

Immaterial factors have been explained about medium, ownership, usage or right to use and location. The amendments have so given tax administration in the area of royalty taxation a new dimension. TDS applies to royalty payments made under Section 194J or Section 195. Where tax is deductible under another law, the Section 194Q clause would not apply.

The Supreme Court in another landmarch judge rendering payment for software not subject to Article 12 of the double tax evasion agreements and Indian payers were not liable to withhold tax u/s 195 as no taxable income was generated in India. This decision was not based on the Engineering Analysis Center of Excellence Private Limited [TS-5014-SC-2021-O]. This is only true for non-resident payments and we may need to see whether Section 194Q applies in this respect. As has been explained elsewhere, for payments to non-residents, TDS u/s 194Q is not applicable.

Section 194J is still applicable to resident payments and Section 194J is not applicable once Section 194J is applicable.

Accordingly, it is concluded that the above review does not apply to software payments in Section 194Q where Sections 194J and 195 apply.

Q.:  Is Section 194Q or 194-O applicable if goods are bought by the customer of an e-commerce participant?

Initially, Section 194-O required e-commerce operator to deduct tax while paying for e-commerce members. For the following reasons, the e-commerce operator should deduct tax under Section 194-O of the Act if the requirement for activation of section 194-O is met.

  • Section 194Q specifically exempts transactions which under any other provisions of the Act are subject to a tax withholding.
  • Section 194-O begins with the non-abstant clause, thus overriding section 194Q.

Q.: Is TDS required to be deducted on the purchase of jewellery that is not related to a business?

In the financial year immediately prior to the financial year in which the goods are purchased, the tax is to be deducted from a buyer carrying on the business whose total sales, gross proceeds or turnover of the business exceeds 10 crores. There is no requirement that purchases only relate to the company. Thus, if a person is covered by the buyer’s definition, tax must be deducted, even if that purchase is not related to his undertaking.

The term goods includes jewellery, which is a movable property. Section 194Q does not specifically exclude TDS from the purchase of jewellery. As a result, if additional conditions are met, the tax on jewellery purchases will be deducted.

However, deducting the TDS by the purchaser may be challenging because the purchaser may argue that the jewellery is being acquired for personal rather than business purposes. CBDT explanation is sought to minimise trouble and misunderstandings.

Q.: Should TDS be deducted or TCS be collected if the buyer purchased items from the seller worth Rs. 45 lakhs in one financial year and Rs. 40 lakhs the previous financial year, and the seller got Rs. 60 lakhs in respect of the two purchases made by the buyer?

If all of the elements of section 206C(1H) are met, the seller must collect the tax since the buyer has not exceeded the threshold limit of Rs. 50 lakhs and the seller has received an amount surpassing the threshold limit of Rs. 50 lakhs.

Q.: Does the purchase price of items include additional, allied and out-of-pocket expenses?

It is imperative to determine accurately the purchase value, since it is important to determine how applicable and what tax would be deducted from the provision. Where the purchase invoice itself reflects these expenses, it must be part of the value for the purchase. More clarity in this connection is, however, expected from CBDT.

Q.: When will the threshold limit of Rs. 50 lakhs be calculated?

With effect from July 1, 2021, Section 194Q of the Finance Act of 2021 has been inserted to provide for the deduction of tax on specified purchases. If the amount or aggregate purchase value exceeds Rs. 50 lakhs in the preceding year, TDS must be deducted. Is the TDS deduction limit of Rs. 50 lakh to be calculated from 01-04-2021 or 01-07-2021?

When Section 206C(1H) of the Finance Act, 2020, went into effect on October 1, 2020, there was a lot of uncertainty. In this regard, the CBDT has clarified in Circular No. 17 dated 29-09-2020 that, because the Rs. 50 lakhs barrier is for the previous year, the sale consideration for triggering TCS under this section must be computed from 01-04-2020. As a result, if a seller has already received Rs. 50 lakhs or more from a buyer before September 30, 2020, TCS will apply to any receipts of sale consideration on or from October 1, 2020.

Using the same logic, it can be concluded that the Rs. 50 lakhs threshold will be calculated beginning on April 1, 2021. If a buyer has already purchased items worth Rs. 50 lakhs or more from a supplier before June 30, 2021, TDS under this section will apply to any purchases made on or after July 1, 2021.

Q.: What is the base year for the Rs.50 lakhs threshold limit?

Each financial year, a limit of 50 lakhs is considered. For a single seller, the exemption of 50 lakhs is valid for one financial year.

Q.: Will TDS be deducted from the total invoice amount, including GST?

A similar issue has been raised in relation to Section 194J, to which the CBDT has clarified in Circular No. 23/2017, dated 19-7-2017, that where the component of ‘GST on services’ comprised in the amount payable to a resident is indicated separately in terms of the agreement or contract between the payer and the payee, tax shall be deducted at source on the amount paid or payable without inc. However, this clarification was only given in relation to the GST on services. There has been no such clarification for GST on goods.

However, with regard to Section 206C(1H), the CBDT has clarified in Circular No. 17, dated 29-09-2020, that because the collection is made with reference to receipt of the amount of sale consideration, no adjustment for indirect taxes, including GST, is required for the collection of tax under this provision.

Because the deduction under Section 194Q is based on the purchase price, adopting the same logic, it may be determined that GST is included in the purchase price, and so the TDS is deductible on the total purchase price, including GST. A clarification from the CBDT in this regard would be greatly appreciated.

Q.: Is it necessary to deduct TDS from a seller’s advance payment?

Section 194Q states that tax must be deducted in any transaction involving the purchase of goods. It does not specify whether such a purchase must be made immediately or at a later date. Because the tax must be deducted at the time of payment or credit, whichever comes first, it is reasonable to conclude that the provision may be attracted even if the purchase occurs in the future.

If the goal is to apply the advance payment to a future purchase of goods, the tax should be deducted at the time of payment or credit, whichever comes first. If the advance payment is not made with the aim of applying it to a future purchase (deposit or loan), but is finally applied to a future purchase, no tax is required to be deducted at the time of payment. When such an advance is offset against the purchase price of goods, the obligation to deduct tax arises.

If the goal is to apply the advance payment to a future purchase of goods, the tax should be deducted at the time of payment or credit, whichever comes first. If an advance payment is made without the intention of adjusting it against a future purchase (deposit or loan), but is eventually adjusted against a future purchase, no tax is needed to be deducted at the time of payment. When such an advance is offset against the purchase price of goods, the obligation to deduct tax arises. Because most advance payments are made solely for the purpose of purchasing goods, it would be reasonable to deduct TDS under section 194Q at the time of advance payment.

Q.:  Will TDS be applied to advance payments for items purchased before July 1, 2021?

With effect from July 1, 2021, the Finance Act of 2021 has inserted Section 194Q. As a result, the terms of this Section will not apply to any payment or credit made in the books before to July 1, 2021. As a result, it would be applicable to any purchases made on or after July 1, 2021.

In other words, when a payment is made or an amount is credited on or after July 1, 2021, the tax should be deducted. As a result, if any of the trigger events (i.e., payment or credit) occurs before the effective date of the provision, there will be no obligation to deduct tax.

However, if the threshold limit has been exceeded and all other conditions have been met, the buyer must deduct the tax on the amount above the threshold limit as of the date of booking the real invoice.

Q.:  Does the amount advanced as a loan to the seller fall under the purview of this provision?

Under this provision, the requirement to deduct TDS arises if the purchase value exceeds the threshold limit in the previous years. The deduction is to be made as soon as payment or credit for the purchase of goods is received. Because the loan advanced by buyers is not a payment towards the purchase of goods, it is exempt from the provisions of this section.

As a result, there is no requirement to deduct TDS on the buyer’s loan.

However, if the loan amount is settled against the purchase price at a later date, the obligation to deduct TDS will emerge. On the date that the parties agreed to modify the loan amount against the outstanding responsibility, the tax will be subtracted.

Q.: Is TCS applicable to amounts collected on invoices issued prior to July 1, 2021, if all of the prerequisites of section 206C (1H) are met?

TCS is applicable for amounts collected prior to July 1, 2021, because TDS is only applicable after July 1, 2021.

Q.:  Should tax be deducted when one branch purchases goods from another?

Any person who is a buyer and is responsible for making payment to the seller for the purchase of goods is required to deduct TDS under this provision. As a result, the presence of two distinct parties as’seller’ and ‘buyer’ is required to interpret a transaction as a purchase. The purchase condition is not met in the context of branch transfer. As a result, the provisions of this section do not apply to branch transfers.

Q.: How should a debit note be treated for computing TDS?

Because the tax must be calculated on the purchase price, the adjustment made to the seller’s ledger by issuing the debit note has no effect on the tax to be deducted. The situation would be the same if the seller returned portion of the consideration to the buyer after deducting the tax. The amount of the purchase value shall not be lowered by the money thus reimbursed or the debit note so modified for TDS computation in such a circumstance.

Q.: Should purchase returns be adjusted when calculating the INR 50 lakh threshold in a fiscal year?

In view of the consideration paid for the ‘purchase’ of goods, the INR 50 lakh limit should be calculated and the value of those goods reduced for arrival at an INR 50 lakh threshold, if they are returned. The goods are therefore returned. However, such purchase returns must have been made on or before the point of tax deduction, as the INR 50 lakh threshold must be checked when the liability to deduct at source arises. Any subsequent returns will be rejected.

Q.:  Is TDS applicable to a work contract if a single invoice is issued?

Under the GST Regulations, a construction contract comprising the delivery of products, labour, and other services is now classed as a service. However, if a single invoice is issued with no distinction between the value of goods and services, the question of whether TDS and TCS provisions apply to the single invoice arises.

Section 194Q (5)(a) states that if tax has been deducted under any other provision of the Act, the provisions of 194Q would not apply.

As a result, if TDS is deducted on the whole invoice amount under any other provision (e.g. 194C), TDS under 194Q is not applicable.

Q.: Whether purchases from various units must be aggregated if the vendor has several units?

If tax is to be deducted from the deduction source, the deductee must provide his PAN to the deductor, if it does not, at higher rates. Where there is a PAN available, each PAN must be measured by a threshold limit of Rs. 50 lakhs. In other words, if various selling units are under the same PAN, they are aggregated to calculate the limit of Rs 50Lakhs, the amount paid or payable for all such units.

Q.: Goods are being transferred for testing purposes.

Section 194Q requires the buyer to deduct TDS when purchasing goods. This provision will not apply because the goods were transferred for testing purposes only and no purchase was made.

Q.: Can a seller apply for a certificate allowing for a lower TDS deduction?

Where TDS is applicable under other provisions such as 194C, 194J, 194I, etc., an assessee can apply to the Assessing Officer for a certificate allowing tax to be deducted at lower rates. Such a certificate shall be issued if the assessee’s existing and estimated tax liability justifies the deduction of tax at a lower rate. Furthermore, certain assessees have the option of filing a declaration for no tax deduction.

The Finance Act of 2021 however did not extend the benefit of applying for a lower rate tax deduction certificate or filing a no deduction declaration for transactions covered by the provisions of Section 194Q. Therefore, the assessee is not able to approach the assessing official in respect of the transactions covered by Section 194Q to issue a certificate for a lower tax deduction or to file a no-deduction statement.

Q.: How can the TDS be deposited?

A corporate assessee and other business assessees are required to pay taxes (including TDS) via internet or debit cards electronically. The deductor must fill in the Challan No. ITNS 281 to deposit the tax.

Other deductors may deposit the tax so deducted in any branch of the Reserve Bank of India, the State Bank of India, or any authorised bank.

Q.: When is the deadline for submitting TDS?

Taxes deducted during the month must be deposited on or before the due date the following dates.

Type of Deductor Mode of payment of TDS Due Date for deposit of TDS
 

 

Office of Government

Without Income-tax Challan  

On the same day on which tax is deducted

With Income-tax Challan ITNS 281 Within 7 days from the end of the month in which tax is deducted
Other Deductor With Income-tax Challan ITNS 281
·   For April-February Month: Within 7 days from the end of the month in which tax is deducted
·   For March Month: On or before April 30

Q.: What are the ramifications of failing to deduct or pay TDS?

If any person who is responsible for deducting tax at source fails to deduct the whole or any part of the tax or fails to deposit the same to the credit of the Central government after deduction, he is considered to be an assessee-in-default.

If the deductor does not deduct tax at source, the deductor is liable for paying an amount of tax he failed to deduct at an interest rate of 1% for each month or part thereof. In the event that the tax deducted is not deposited at the origin, however, the applicant will be liable to pay interest of 1,5% on or part of the tax that he did not deposit with the central government loan for each month.

Apart from this in accordance with Article 40(a)(ia) of the law, the taxable income of the buyer will not be paid for at least 30 percent of the purchasing value that was responsible for TDS.

Q.: If the buyer pays tax due on the income reported in the return of income, is the seller considered as the assessee in default?

According to Section 201 of the Income-tax Act, a deductor who fails to deduct tax at source is not considered in default if the payee has taken such amount into account when computing income in the return and has paid the tax due on such disclosed income. A certificate is to be obtained in Form No. 26A and submitted electronically by the deductor from the chartered accountable.

Thus, the buyer is not considered an assessee-in-default if the seller has taken the purchase amount into account when calculating his income and has paid the tax due on the income declared in the return.

Q.: When and how does the seller’s tax collection responsibility arise?

The buyer bears the primary responsibility for deducting tax; however, if the buyer fails to deduct tax, the seller bears the primary responsibility for collecting the tax. When the seller receives the amount as sales consideration, he is required to collect the tax. As a result, upon receipt of sales consideration, the seller must ensure that the buyer has deducted the tax. If the buyer has not deducted the tax, the seller must collect it. The seller can obtain from the buyer a declaration regarding the status of tax deduction at source.

It should also be noted that, because 194Q becomes effective on July 1, 2021, the seller is required to collect tax on sales consideration received prior to July 1, 2021.

Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) RATE CHART for the FY 2024-25

tds rate chart 24-25

July 7, 2021 / Company Law Compliances

CORPORATE AND PROFESSIONAL UPDATE AUG 9, 2016

Tax update:

www.caindelhiindia.com; Corporate updates
www.caindelhiindia.com; Corporate updates

Direct Tax:

The scrap and spent solution are part of the manufacturing process and eligible for exemption u/s 10B. [The CIT vs. M/s. Orchid Chemicals & Pharmaceuticals Ltd. – 2016 (8) TMI 278 – Madras High Court]

ITAT Bangalore in the below citied case held that as assessee has failed to establish this fact that he Diamonds sold in the present year are the same Diamonds which declared by the assessee in VDIS declaration 1997  hence  addition u/s 68 will be made.( Shri Ramavatar S. Mahajan Vs. The ITO, Hubli)

Delhi ITAT holds that EPFO (Employees Provident Fund Organisation governed by Employees Provident Fund Act, 1952) is liable to deduct tax u/s 192 in respect of settlement/withdrawals of accumulated balances by employees before 5 years  of rendering of continuous service during  AYs 2008-09 to 2013-14-[TS-422-ITAT-2016(DEL) ]

Even a motor vehicle can be treated as machinery if it is used in execution of works contract under Gujarat VAT State of Gujarat v. Yantraman Automac (P.) Ltd. [2016] 72  62 (Gujarat)

A co. preparing its final accounts on basis of a calendar year couldn’t be chosen as comparable Core Objects India (P.) Ltd. v. Income-tax Officer, Ward 11(1), Bangalore [2016] 72  53 (Bangalore – Trib.)

No interest if differential service tax is paid prior to finalization of provisional assessment
Canara Bank v. Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs (LTU) [2016] 72  52 (Bangalore – CESTAT)

Fee charged by Finance Co. for collecting EMI from bank customers would be considered for sec. 36(viii) deduction Gruh Finance Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner Income-tax, Circle-4, Ahmedabad[2016] 72  48 (Ahmedabad – Trib.)

TDS under sec. 192 applicable to EPF Scheme prior to introduction of sec. 192A
Employees Provident Fund Organization v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, (TDS), Noida [2016] 72  83 (Delhi – Trib.)

Capital goods used for generation of electricity eligible for credit even if they are installed on premises of AE OPG Metals (P.) Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Trichy
[2016] 72  51 (Chennai – CESTAT)

No abuse of dominance by DLF in Lucknow as there were many real estate developers therein Vinay Kala and Smt. Mina Kala v. DLF Ltd. [2016] 72  41 (CCI)

Indirect Tax:

Kerala VAT dealer can claim rebate of entire tax if output tax doesn’t exceed total rebate claimed Maya Rajeev v. Commercial Tax Officer [2016] 72  61 (Kerala)

Intellectual Property Right service – taxability u/s 66A – Held that – to be categorized for service tax purpose under IPR, such right should have been registered with trade mark/patent authority. As such, there can be no provision of IPR service for tax liability on reverse charge basis. Demand set aside and Decided in favor of assessee – Chambal Fertilizers and Chemicals Ltd. Versus C.C.E., Jaipur – 2016 – CESTAT NEW DELHI

If Indian courier-agency hires foreign courier-agencies to complete delivery outside India of foreign-bound packages, then, since role of foreign agencies commences and ends beyond border of India, hence, services of foreign agencies cannot be treated as wholly/partly performed in India and cannot, therefore, be taxed in India under reverse charge under section 66A-(First Flight Couriers Ltd. v. Commissioner of Service Tax, Mumbai-II.)

GST

Constitutional amendments on GST Bill made by Rajya Sabha, rectified by Lok sabha unanimously.

FAQ on Company Law:

Query:  In case a director has attended Board meetings through video conferencing mode. Will it be counted for quorum. Please advice

Answer: Yes, as per Rule 3(2)(e) & (f) of the Companies (Meetings of Board and its Powers) Rules, 2014, any director who desire, to participate may intimate his intention of participation through electronic mode at the beginning of calendar year and such declaration shall be valid for one calendar year. And in absence of any intimation, it shall be assumed that director shall attend the meeting in person.

Further, Rule 4 of the Companies (Meetings of Board and its Powers) Rules, 2014 provides for the matters which shall not be dealt with in a meeting through video conferencing mode or other audio visual means.

Further, as per Section 174 of the Companies Act 2013, participation of directors through video conferencing shall be counted for the purpose of quorum.

Query:   We have a query regarding the regularization of Additional director in a Private Limited Company. We want to change designation of a person from additional director to Director Are we required to re appoint him as the  Director in the Annual General Meeting of the Company as he is suppose to retire in the ensuing Annual General Meeting or else. Please advise us that how can we change his designation from additional director to Director?

Answer:  You shall have to convene an Extra ordinary General meeting of the Company or you may regularize him in the ensuing Annual General Meeting also, for the purpose. Thereafter, you need to file Form DIR-12 and purpose selected should be “Change in Designation” and attach the copy of Resolution passed in the General Meeting of the Company with the Form.

Further, to state that Form DIR 12 is not only meant for appointment or Cessation of Director only. It is meant for Change in Designation as well.

Query:   How can Board meeting of an OPC be convened?

Answer:  For the purposes of holding board meetings, in case of an OPC which has only One director, It shall be deemed to sufficient compliance if the resolution is entered in the minutes of meetings maintained and such minutes be signed and dated by director as well as member, then such date shall be deemed to be the date of the board meeting for all the purposes under Companies Act, 2013.

IRDA:

The Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India has issued Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (Listed Indian Insurance Companies) Guidelines, 2016. These guidelines shall be applicable to all insurers whose equity shares are listed on the stock exchanges and to the allotment process pursuant to the public issue. These guidelines shall be in addition to, and should be read with any other law for the time being in force, including the IRDAI (Issuance of capital by Indian Insurance Companies transacting other than Life Insurance Business) Regulations, 2015. These guidelines shall come into effect on the day of their issuance.

RBI Updates:-

  • RBI permits setting up of IFSC Banking Units (IBUs). Notification No. DBR.IBD.BC. 8536/23.13.004/2015-16.
  • RBI has issued a notification regarding Implementation of Accounting Standards (Ind AS) vide Notification no. RBI/2016-17/34 dated 04/08/2016.

Key Dates:

  • Income tax department extends ITR-V verification deadline till 31 JAN 2016.
  • 10.08.16 is last date to file ER-1,2 & 6 for Excise returns by Non SSI assesses, EOUs,& by units paying duty of more than 1Cr respectively, for July 2016.
  • Excise return in form ER-1 for NON SSI assessee for the month of July: 10/08/2016
  • Return by EOU in the ER-2 form for the month of July-10/08/2016
  • Public Servants Annual Assets Liabilities Return Filing due date extended to 31.12.2016
  • 15-08-16 is the last date for Issue of TDS certificates in form 16A for quarter ended 30-6-16 by all deductors.

The only limit to our realization of tomorrow will be our doubts of today.    -Franklin D. Roosevelt

The way to get started is to quit talking and begin doing.     -Walt Disney

Positive thinking is the investment which gives us regular dividend in the form of self confidence.

We look forward for your valuable comments. www.caindelhiindia.com

FOR  FURTHER  QUERIES  CONTACT US:

W: www.caindelhiindia.com         E: info@ caindelhiindia.com    T:011-233-4-33333,     M: 9-555-555-480

October 13, 2020 / Uncategorized

Amendments vide Finance Bill, 2016 applicable wef. 1st April. 2016

Amendments vide Finance Bill, 2016 applicable wef. 1st April. 2016

www.caindelhiindia.com; FIANCNE BILL
www.caindelhiindia.com; FIANCNE BILL

The Finance Bill, 2016 which was brought into by the Union Budget, 2016-17 come out with no. of amendments applicable from varied dates. Changes which were effective from the 1st day of April, stands imbibed are listed as follows:-

Change relating to Mega Exemption Notification 

Exemptions Withdrawn

  • Exemption in respect of Services provided by a senior advocate to an advocate or partnership firm of advocates withdrawn
  • Services of transport of passengers by ropeway, cable car or aerial tramway withdrawn

Exemptions Introduced

  • Services of assessing bodies empanelled centrally by Directorate General of Training, Ministry of Skill Development & Entrepreneurship
  • Services provided by way of skill/vocational training by Deen Dayal Upadhyay Grameen Kaushalya Yojana training partners
  • The threshold exemption limit of consideration charged for services provided by a performing artist in folk or classical art forms of music, dance or theatre, increased from Rs 1 lakh to Rs 1.5 lakh per performance.
  • Services of life insurance business provided by way of annuity under the National Pension System (NPS) regulated by Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority (PFRDA) of India
  • Services of general insurance business provided under “Niramaya” Health Insurance scheme launched by National Trust for the Welfare of Persons with Autism, Cerebral Palsy, Mental Retardation and Multiple Disability in collaboration with private/public insurance companies.
  • Services provided by Employees’ Provident Fund Organisation (EPFO) to employees.
  • Services provided by Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA) of India.
  • Services provided by Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) set up under SEBI Act, 1992, by way of protecting the interests of investors in securities and to promote the development of, and to regulate, the securities market.
  • Services provided by National Centre for Cold Chain Development under Department of Agriculture, Cooperation and Farmer’s Welfare, Government of India, by way of knowledge dissemination
  • Services provided by Biotechnology Industry Research Assistance Council (BIRAC) approved biotechnology incubators to the incubatees.

Changes wrt. Reverse Charge mechanism

  • Liability to pay service tax on any service provided by Government or a local authority to business entities shall be on the service recipient.
  • Services by Mutual Fund Agents to Asset Management Co. put under reverse charge

Amendments wrt. Abatement Notification no. 26/2012-ST vide Notification no. 08/2016-ST dt. 01.03.2016

  • Construction of a complex, building, civil structure or a part thereof:- Uniform abatement @ 70% is now being prescribed, subject to fulfillment of the existing conditions.
  • Services by a tour operator:- Only two abatement rates introduced @ 90% and 70% for the purposes of booking accommodation & for other services, respectively. Definition of package Tour deleted
  • Transport of goods in a vessel:- Credit of input services could be availed now
  • Transport of Passengers, with or without accompanied belongings, by-
    – a stage carriage: Added now, earlier not existed in this abated entry
  • Services provided by a foreman of chit fund in relation to chit:- Newly inserted entry, however, earlier said entry existed which was omitted wef. 1st April, 2015; abatement @ 30% without availment of any credit
  • Services of goods transport agency in relation to transportation of used household goods:- Newly Inserted; abatement @ 60 % without allowing any credit
  • Services of goods transport agency in relation to transportation of goods other than used household goods:- Substituted for “Services of goods transport agency in relation to transportation of goods”.
  • Transport of passengers, with or without accompanied belongings by rail: CENVAT credit of input services being allowed now
  • Transport of goods in containers by rail by any person other than Indian Railways:- Newly introduced; abatement @ 60% ; Credit allowed for input services
  • Transport of Goods by Rail:- No change in Rates ; CENVAT Credit wrt. Input service now being allowed

Changes to Service tax Rules, 1994

  • Service tax liability on single premium annuity (insurance) policies is being rationalized and the effective alternate service tax rate (composition rate) now being prescribed at 1.4% of the total premium charged
  • Benefit of (a) quarterly payment of service tax being extended to OPC and HUF and (b) payment on receipt basis being extended to OPC.

Changes in CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004

  • Change in the definition of Capital Goods:- Wagons of sub heading 8606 92 of the Central Excise Tariff and equipment and appliance used in an office located within a factory are being included
  • CENVAT credit on inputs and capital goods used for pumping of water, for captive use in the factory, is being allowed
  • Capital goods having value up to Rs. ten thousand per piece are being included in the definition of inputs
  • Service by way of transportation of goods by a vessel from customs station of clearance in India to a place outside India is being excluded from the definition of, “exempted service CENVAT Credit for radio-frequency spectrum, mines etc.
  • Provisions related to calculation of CENVAT Credit attributable to exempted services has been redrafted
  • Change in manner of distribution of CENVAT Credit by Input Service Distributor (ISD) Insertion of new Rule 7B for multiple manufacturing units to maintain a common warehouse for inputs.
  • Change in method for determining whether a particular credit has been utilized vide Rule 14(2) of CCR, 2004
  • Annual Return prescribed for manufacturer of final products or provider of output services vide Rule 9A
July 14, 2021 / Company Law Compliances

CORPORATE & PROFESSIONAL UPDATE DECEMBER 15, 2015

CORPORATE & PROFESSIONAL UPDATE DECEMBER 15, 2015

www.caindelhiindia.com; corporate updates
www.caindelhiindia.com; corporate updates

INCOME TAX ACT

SECTION 5

INCOME – ACCRUAL OF

Income : Where interest income from security accrued in terms of books of account maintained by assessee, but same was offered to tax on actual receipt, and Tribunal passed detailed order in favour of assessee in earlier year, which it followed in current assessment year also, exercise undertaken by tribunal could not be termed as perverse – [2015] 63 166 (Bombay)

SECTION 14A

EXPENDITURE INCURRED IN RELATION TO INCOME NOT INCLUDIBLE IN TOTAL INCOME

Interest of : Where assessee invested its own funds in shares resulting in earning of dividend income exempt from tax, impugned disallowance made by Assessing Officer by invoking provisions of section 14A, read with Rule 8D was not sustainable – [2015] 63 198 (Panaji – Trib.)

SECTION 32

DEPRECIATION – ALLOWANCE/RATE OF

100 per cent depreciation : Electrically operated vehicles including battery power or fuel cell powered vehicles are entitled to 100 per cent depreciation under Appendix I, Part-A, Item III(3)(xiii)(o) of Income-tax Rules, 1962 –[2015] 63 176 (Calcutta)

SECTION 43A

FOREIGN CURRENCY, RATE OF EXCHANGE, CHANGE IN

Depreciation : Expenditure incurred to get rid of forward contracts which assessee had entered into for purpose of protecting itself from fluctuations of foreign exchange, could not come within four corners of section 43A –[2015] 63 .com 176 (Calcutta)

SECTION 44BBA

NON-RESIDENTS – BUSINESS OF OPERATION OF AIR CRAFT IN CASE OF

Applicability of : When there is no taxable income, section 44BBA cannot be applied to bring to tax presumptive income constituting 5 per cent of gross receipts – [2015] 64 93 (Delhi)

SECTION 45

CAPITAL GAINS – CHARGEABLE AS

The question of bringing to tax under Section 45 (5) (b) of the Act the enhanced compensation received by the Assessee during the relevant previous year by furnishing bank guarantee will have to await the final decision in the appellate proceedings emanating from the order of the ADJ in the proceedings under Section 31 (2) LA Act. Question of assessing to tax the interest received by the assessee on enhanced compensation in the same year in which the enhanced compensation is received will also have to await the final decision in the appellate proceedings. – [2015] 64 122 (Delhi)

SECTION 80QQB

DEDUCTIONS – ROYALTY INCOMES, ETC. OF AUTHORS OF CERTAIN BOOKS OTHER THAN TEXT BOOKS

Where assessee had authored a book on income tax problems in question answer form which was titled “How to Handle Income-tax problems”, since his book was on a complex issue which really needed intellect and knowledge, said book was a literary work in terms of section 80QQB; and, hence, royalty received on same would be entitled to deduction – [2015] 64 121 (Kolkata – Trib.)

SECTION 92C

TRANSFER PRICING – COMPUTATION OF ARM’S LENGTH PRICE

Selling expenses incurred for making sales are distinct from AMP expenses and, hence, should not be included in base amount for computing ALP of AMP expenses – [2015] 64 120 (Delhi – Trib.)

Comparables and adjustments/Methods – PSM : When transactions involved contributions of multiple entities and are integrated and interrelated and they cannot be separately evaluated for purpose of determining ALP of any one transaction, ‘PSM’ is ‘MAM’ – [2015] 63 304 (Delhi – Trib.)

SECTION 269SS

DEPOSITS – MODE OF TAKING/ACCEPTING

Amount received from partners : Where assessee received deposits from partners and sister concerns in cash, since there was no material whatsoever to infer that those receipts were anything other than loans or deposits, impugned penalty order passed under section 271D for violating provisions of section 269SS, was to be confirmed – [2015] 63 196 (Kerala)

SECTION 271D

PENALTY – FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH SECTION 269SS

Initiation of penalty proceedings : Penalty proceedings under provisions of sections 271D and 271E are initiated not by Assessing Officer but only with issuance of notice by Joint Commissioner – [2015] 63 196 (Kerala)

SECTION 271E

PENALTY – FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH SECTION 269T

Recording of satisfaction : Where pursuant to directions issued by Commissioner (Appeals), Assessing Officer passed a fresh assessment order wherein no satisfaction was recorded for initiating penalty proceedings under section 271E, impugned penalty order passed under said section deserved to be set aside – [2015] 64 .75 (SC)

COMPANIES ACT

SECTION 457

WINDING UP – POWERS OF LIQUIDATOR

Any claim with regard to Provident Fund dues can only lie before Commissioner, Provident Fund, under relevant statute, consequently, whilst other claims for any unpaid wages etc. may well be admitted by Official Liquidator, however, any claims raised directly to Official Liquiation for payment of Provident Fund dues would be an exercise in futility since it is bound to be rejected on ground that company was never obliged to pay workmen any such amounts in first place – [2015] 64 123 (Delhi)

COMPETITION ACT

SECTION 4

PROHIBITION OF ABUSE OF DOMINANCE POSITION

Where before participating in e-auctions, it is was duty of potential bidders to satisfy themselves about quality of coal being offered from a source; bidders not having done that could not now complain that conditions of spot e-auction scheme framed by Coal India Limited were arbitrary and unfair, no contravention of section 4 was made out – [2015] 64 74 (CCI)

CENTRAL EXCISE ACT

SECTION 11AB

INTEREST ON DELAYED PAYMENT OF DUTY

Assessee was public sector undertaking, manufacturing iron and steel products. It paid excise duty on clearance of goods and differential duty due to price escalation. Department demanded interest on late payment of differential duty. Apex Court observed that when goods were cleared, there was no certainty of price escalation. It was difficult to accept that price was understated on date of removal of goods. Hence, the larger bench should be constituted to decide the impugned issue – [2015] 64 118 (SC)

CUSTOMS ACT

SECTION 25

EXEMPTIONS – CUSTOMS – BASE TRANSRECEIVER STATION (BTS)

‘Antenna and installation cable/mini-link’ are inseparable parts of Base Transreceiver Station (BTS); hence, antenna etc. imported along with BTS would be classified as BTS and would be eligible for concessional rate of duty applicable to BTS – [2015] 64 8 (SC)

CST & VAT

SECTION 2(34) OF KARNATAKA VALUE ADDED TAX ACT, 2003

TAXABLE TURNOVER – ALLOWABLE DEDUCTIONS

Where assessee claimed deduction in respect of discount given to purchasing dealer in form of credit note subsequent to issuance of tax invoice and Assessing Authority disallowed claim of deduction, assessee was entitled to give further discount even after sale had been completed, provided it was trade discount or pursuant to any contract – [2015] 64 94 (Karnataka)

CENVAT CREDIT RULES

RULE 3

CENVAT CREDIT – GENERAL

Inputs and capital goods used in Research and Development (R&D) and Quality Control Laboratory for purpose of testing of inputs and testing of samples of final products, etc., are eligible for cenvat credit – [2015] 63 318 (Ahmedabad – CESTAT

STATUTES

DIRECT TAX LAWS

Section 80C of the Income-tax Act, 1961 – Deduction – In respect of Insurance Premium, etc. – Notified Scheme under section 80C(2)(xiv) – NOTIFICATION NO.91/2015 [F.NO.178/21/2014-ITA.I], DATED 8-12-2015

Mineral (Mining by Government Company) Rules, 2015 – NOTIFICATION NO. GSR 927(E) [F.NO.1/13/2015-M.VI], DATED 3-12-2015

CORPORATE LAWS

Outsourcing by Depositories – CIRCULAR NO.MRD/DP/19/2015, DATED 9-12-2015

Review of Annual Custody/Issuer Charges – CIRCULAR NO.MRD/DP/18/2015, DATED 9-12-2015

INDIRECT TAX LAWS (ST./EX./CUS. & (CST & VAT)

Minutes of Tariff Conference held in Chandigarh on 28-10-2015 and 29-10-2015 – LETTER F.NO.96/85/2015-CX.I, DATED 7-12-2015

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances; Hope the information will assist you in your Professional endeavors. For query or help, contact: info@caindelhiindia.com or call at 011-23343333.

July 7, 2021 / INCOME TAX

COMMITTEE OF GOVT OF INDIA GIVEN 10 SUGGESTIONS FOR TAX REFORM PANEL TO SIMPLIFY INCOME-TAX PROVISIONS.

COMMITTEE OF GOVT OF INDIA GIVEN 10 SUGGESTIONS FOR TAX REFORM PANEL TO SIMPLIFY INCOME-TAX PROVISIONS.

www.caindelhiindia.com; Business consultancy
www.caindelhiindia.com; Business consultancy

The Government has constituted a 10-member Committee (‘Tax Reform Panel’) on October 27, 2015 to simplify provisions of the Income-Tax Act. Justice R.V. Easwar, former Judge of the Delhi High Court is the Chairman of Tax Reform Panel.

The objective of Tax Reform Panelis to study and identify the provisions in the Income-Tax Act which are leading to litigations; to study and identify the provisions which are impacting the ease of doing business. Tax Reform Panel will recommend alternatives and modifications in the existing provisions to bring about predictability and certainty in tax laws without having substantial impact on the tax base and revenue collection.

‘Taxmann’ has taken first initiative to invite public suggestions for consideration of ‘Tax Reform Panel’. It received numerous suggestions from the public to simplify income-tax provisions. Following suggestions were sent to ‘Tax Reform Panel’.

  • Payment made to a resident or a non-resident – Needed parity in the provisions.

Under the Indian tax laws, Section 40(a)(i) (payment to non-resident) and Section 40(a)(ia) (payment to resident), provide that where certain specified payments in the nature of interest royalty, etc., are made by the taxpayers, these shall not be allowed as deductions where the payer of such sum does not withhold requisite taxes thereon or after deduction of such taxes, does not pay the taxes to the Government within the prescribed time-limit.

Although both the disallowance provisions are same, yet an exemption has been provided to cases involving payments to residents. It has been provided that no disallowance shall be made where payment has been made to a resident without deduction of tax, if the recipient takes into account such receipt while computing its taxable income and files the income-tax return under section 139(1) in respect of such income.

However, in respect of payments made to non-residents under Section 40(a)(i), there is no corresponding exemption, which implies that even if the recipient of such payment takes into account such receipts in his computation of business income and files return under section 139(1) for same, the disallowance would still be made in the hands of the resident payer.

  • Judicial precedent

In the case of Mitsubishi Corporation India (P.) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT [2014] 50  379 (Delhi – Trib.), the Hon’ble Delhi ITAT held that in view of the non-discrimination clause under the India-Japan tax treaty, no disallowance shall be made under Section 40(a)(i) for payments made to non-residents, if the non-resident recipient has considered such payments while filing his income-tax return and has paid taxes on such income. In effect, this judgment implied that any relaxation granted to a payer in respect of payments to residents, would constitute discrimination if same relaxation is not granted for similar payments made to non-residents.

It is recommended that an amendment should be made to remove this anomaly. As India is working hard to improve its image as a suitable investment destination, such an amendment would only work positively to reassure our commitment to be a favorable tax regime.

  • Is investment in name of relatives valid for Sec. 54, 54B and 54F exemptions?

Sometimes the conditions provided under the Act to claim exemptions are not properly understood or appreciated by the assessees. Consequently, claims for such exemptions are rejected either at the assessment stage or at revision stage or at appellate stage.

Such situation is being witnessed while claiming exemptions under Sections 54, 54B and 54F of the Income-tax Act, when a new capital asset is purchased in the name of assessee’s relatives. Though such denial of exemption by the Assessing Officer or appellate authorities may be justified, the assessees should be made aware of such prohibition by means of an insertion of a proviso in respective section(s) at the initial stage itself. Assessees may be swayed by the broad proposition that all exemptions provisions have to be interpreted liberally but this any not be always so.

  • Judicial precedents

The Bombay High Court in the case of Prakash v ITO [2008] 173  311 has held that in order to qualify for exemption under section 54F of the Act it is necessary and obligatory to make investment in residential house in name of assessee only and not in name of any other person.

The Hyderabad Bench of ITAT in the case of Girish Dharod v. Asstt. CIT [2013] 40  282 has held that liberal interpretation of statutory provisions taken by Courts to grant exemption available under section 54 of the Act, even in cases of investments in names of spouse and minor children of assessee cannot be extended beyond a point so to cover investments made in names of other blood relations or other relations.

The Andhra Pradesh High Court in the case of GantaVijaya Lakshmi v. ITO[2015] 54  301 has held that assessee is not entitled to relief under sections 54F and 54B of the Act in respect of properties acquired in name of her married daughters.

It is recommended that a proviso may be inserted suitably prohibiting the assessee from making a claim in respect of investments made in an altogether different name or in the name of a distant relative. Insertion of this proviso should also clarify that exemption would not be denied merely because the name of spouse and/or son /unmarried daughter/blood relative is added in the new investments as a precautionary measure and not otherwise.

  • Age old threshold limits for maintenance of books should be raised.

As per Section 44AA of the Income-tax Act, every person carrying on specified profession shall keep and maintain such books of account and other documents as may enable the Assessing Officer to compute his total income chargeable to tax.

However, every person carrying on business or any other than specified profession is required to maintain books of account if his income from business or profession exceeds Rs. 1,20,000 or his total sales, turnover or gross receipts, as the case may be, in business or profession exceedRs. 10,00,000 in any one of the three years immediately preceding the previous year.

These limits were last revised in 1999.

These age old-limits for maintenance of books needs to be revised so that compliance cost for small taxpayers would be reduced.

  • Presumptive taxation scheme should be introduced for professionals.

Section 44AD of the Income-tax Act provides for presumption taxation scheme for the resident Individual, HUF and Partnership Firm (excluding LLP) engaged in eligible business.

“Eligible business” means –

  • Any business except the business of plying, hiring or leasing goods carriages referred to in section 44AE; and
  • Whose total turnover or gross receipts in the previous year does not exceed an amount of one crore rupees.

Under the scheme, the assessee is exempted from maintaining books of account and obtaining tax audit report if he discloses at least 8% of his turnover or gross receipts, as the case may be, as his income and pays tax thereon. However, the persons engaged in specified profession like legal or accounting, etc., are not entitled to take benefit of this scheme.

A similar presumptive taxation scheme should be introduced for such specified professionals wherein they should be exempted from maintaining books and obtaining tax audit report on disclosure of fixed presumptive income. The presumptive income for such professionals may be set in the range of 25% to 35%.

  • Separate provisions should be introduced to tax capital gains from JDAs.

Real estate developers often enter into Joint Development Agreements (‘JDA‘) with the land owners.As per the said JDA, real estate developers are required to develop land. Accordingly, the land owner hands over the vacant possession of the land to the developers and also assigns the development rights to them. In return of giving up rights in the land, the land owner receives an agreed share in the developed property.

The taxability of transactions resulting from JDA has been a contentious issue since a long time. Now one of the issues relate to year of taxability of capital gains, i.e., whether taxable in the year of entering into JDA or the year of allowing of actual possession or the year of receipt of developed property?

It is recommended that separate provisions should be introduced in the Income-tax Act for taxability of capital gains in JDAs. It will bring certainty in the tax law and will end sufferings of the taxpayers.

  • Repayment or acceptance of loans/deposits by book entries.

The provisions of section 269SS of the Income-tax Act provide that no person shall take from any person any loan or deposit otherwise than by an account-payee cheque or account-payee bank draft or online transfer through a bank account, if the amount of such loan or deposit is twenty thousand rupees or more.

Similarly, Section 269T of the Income-tax Act provides that any loan or deposit shall not be repaid, otherwise than by an account-payee cheque or account-payee bank draft or online transfer through a bank account, if the amount of loan or deposit is twenty thousand rupees or more.

The issue is whether repayment or acceptance of loan or deposit of Rs. 20,000 or more through journal entries would amount to violation of provisions of section 269SS or 269T?

In this regard, the Bombay High Court in the case of CIT v. Triumph International Finance (I) Ltd. [2012] 22  138 (Bom.) held that repayment of loan/deposit by debiting the account through journal would amount to contravention of the provisions of section 269T of the Act. However, the High Court set aside the penalty imposed by the AO as assessee had shown the reasonable cause for such transaction.

However, the Delhi High Court has taken a different view in respect of the underlying issue in the case of CIT v. Noida Toll Bridge Co. Ltd. [2004] 139 Taxman 115 (Delhi). It was held that where associated enterprise of the assessee has made payment via account-payee cheque on behalf of assessee, and, consequently, debited the accounts of assessee in its books of account then such transaction could not be held to be in contravention of the provisions of section 269SS.

It should be clarified whether repayment or acceptance of any loans or depositsvia journal entry would be deemed as contravention of provisions of Section 269SS or Section 269T?

  • Sale of ‘listed shares’ by NR to be taxed at 10% after giving effect to first proviso to Sec. 48

The first proviso to section 48 provides relief from exchange fluctuations to foreign companies and other non-residents purchasing shares of Indian companies in foreign exchange. Second proviso to section 48 provides for the benefit of indexation while computing long-term capital gain, thus providing relief against inflation. Indexation relief is not available to assessees covered by first proviso.

Tax on long-term capital gains is levied at 20% (plus applicable surcharge and education cess) for all assessees under the provisions of section 112. Proviso to section 112 provides for concessional rate of tax in case of transfer of listed securities. The profits, in that case, are liable to be taxed at 10% (plus applicable surcharge and education cess) on the amount of long-term capital gains before giving benefit of indexation under the second proviso to section 48. Thus, in case of transfer of listed securities the assessees have the option to pay tax on long-term capital gains at 20% with indexation or 10% without indexation benefit. The transfer should be otherwise than through the stock exchange [since the long-term capital gain on sale of shares through stock exchange is exempt from tax under section 10(38)].

Issues arise as to whether a foreign company (which sells listed shares of an Indian company otherwise than on stock exchange), entitled to the benefit of the first proviso to section 48, can also have the benefit of 10% tax rate on capital gains?.

  • Judicial Precedents:

The Hon’ble Delhi High Court in case of Cairn UK Holdings Ltd v Director of Income Tax [2013] 38  179 (Delhi) has held that a foreign company (which is entitled to the benefit of the first proviso to section 48) is entitled to the benefit of lower rate of 10% on the sale of listed shares, where such sale takes place otherwise than on stock exchange.

Relying on the decision of Cairn UK Holdings the Authority of Advance Rulings (AAR) in Pan Asia Igate Solutions, Mauritius, In re[2014] 45  322(AAR – New Delhi) has made similar observations.

In case of Assistant Director of Income Tax v Abbott Capital India [2014] 46  33 (Mumbai – ITAT), the Mumbai ITAT has also held that the UK based foreign company was entitled to the benefit of lower rate of tax at 10% while computing long-term capital gain on the sale of shares of Abbott India Limited (a company listed on Bombay Stock Exchange) to another company. The ITAT relied on the decision in the case of Cairn UK Holdings for its findings.

Inspite of the above decisions the income-tax authorities have been taking a contradictory view on this issue. It is recommended that a specific amendment may be brought about to provide that foreign companies/non-residents who are covered by the first proviso to section 48 would be subject to tax at 10% in case of transfer of listed shares as provided by proviso to section 112.

  • Employees contribution to PF/ESI is deductible if paid before due date of filing of return.

As per provisions of section 36(1)(va) deduction in respect of PF/ESI contribution received from employees shall be available only if such sum is credited to the employee’s account in the relevant fund or funds on or before the due date.

However, the due dates for repayment and applicability of Section 43B have always been a matter of dispute between taxpayers and Assessing Officers.

The Delhi High Court in case of CIT v. Aimil [2010] 188 265 (Delhi) held that the employees’ contribution towards PF/ESI would qualify for deduction even if paid after due date prescribed under Provident Fund Act/ESI Act but before due date of filing of return under Section 139(1). Similar views were taken by various High Courts.

However, Gujarat High Court in case of CIT v. Gujarat State Road Transport Corporation [2014] 41  100 (Gujarat) held that if assessee did not deposit employees’ contribution to PF/ESI in relevant fund before due date of relevant fund, no deduction would be admissible, even though he had deposited the same before due date of filing of return of income under Section 139(1).

It is recommended that provisions should be introduced in the Act to clarify the above issues.

Thus, it should be clarified that employees and employer’s contribution to PF/ESI shall be treated at par under provisions of Section 43B for claiming deduction.

  • Deemed acceptance of rectification application if rectification is not carried out in 6 months’ time.

Section 154(8) provides that where an application for rectification is made to an Income-tax authority, the authority shall pass an order within a period of six months from the end of the month in which the application is received.

The aforesaid provision is being widely interpreted by the Assessing Officers in a manner, that if no action is taken within six months as referred to above, the application of the assessee is deemed to have lapsed and the same need not be entertained. It is most unfortunate that by adopting such an unfair interpretation, Assessing Officers are taking benefit of their own defaults.

It is recommended that where rectification is not carried out within a period of six months, such application should be deemed to have been allowed. Moreover, the erring officials must be held to be personally accountable for the lapse.

It is also requested that in cases of tax refunds due to the assessee, the time-limit of four years for rectification should be waived off, more particularly in cases where the assessee is not at fault for the delay in disposal of an application for rectification.

  • Selection of cases for scrutiny assessment.

The issuance of clear guidelines by the CBDT for selection of scrutiny cases every year has indeed been a welcome measure, since it has introduced a high level of transparency and also helped in preventing mischievous practices which prevailed earlier.

In this regard, it is suggested that where any addition made in the case of a taxpayer in any earlier year is of a repetitive nature, scrutiny should not be initiated in a subsequent year on such a count alone.

Out of the cases selected for scrutiny, a majority of cases pertain to limited scrutiny or verification of specific points arising out of AIR/CIB/26AS Information. Presently, Assessing Officers do not share this vital information with taxpayers and quite oftenly send out stereotyped questionnaires even seeking a whole lot of irrelevant information. In all such cases, when the first notice for scrutiny is issued, the taxpayer must be clearly informed of the specific reasons for such scrutiny and irrelevant questions should be strictly avoided. This transparency will go a long way in creating greater trust, confidence and goodwill in the minds of the taxpayers for the Income-tax Department.

CBDT had issued Instruction No. 7/2014, dated 26-09-2014 directing that for the cases selected for Scrutiny under CASS on the basis of either AIR Data, CIB Information or for mismatch of Form 26AS Data, the scope of enquiry should be limited only to the verification of those particular aspects. Keeping in view the spirit and underlying objective of these instructions, they should be applied to all pending assessments, including A.Y. 2013-14. Several Officers are interpreting the above instruction as being applicable only to cases selected for scrutiny during A.Y. 2014-15. It needs to be immediately clarified that this narrow interpretation is clearly unjustified.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances; Hope the information will assist you in your Professional endeavors. For query or help, contact: info@caindelhiindia.com or call at 011-233 433 33

October 16, 2020 / Uncategorized

CORPORATE TAX UPDATE FOR 28th OCTOBER 2015

CORPORATE TAX UPDATE FOR 28th OCTOBER 2015

Daily Updates & News:

Direct Tax

Assessee cannot be compelled to claim depreciation as Exp. 5 to Sec 32(1)(ii) is not retrospective

 CIT vs. M/s Shree Triveni Foods (Himachal Pradesh High Court) , IT Appeal No.-43 of 2009 along with 44,45,46,49 and 51 of 2009, Date of Pronouncement-23rd April, 2015 Brief of the case: The Hon’ble Himachal Pradesh High Court in the case of CIT vs. M/s Shree Triveni Foods held that the claim of depreciation for assessment years under dispute was not mandatory and therefore, the assessee could not be compelled to exercise the option as an obligation. Is is further held that Claim of

 Sec. 14A disallowance shall also be added back for computing book profits under sec. 115JB

 Recently, the Bangalore Bench of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal (the Tribunal) in the case of Sobha Developers’ (the taxpayer) held that disallowance under Section 14A read with Rule 8D of the Income-tax Rules, 1962 (the Rules) is applicable while computing book profits under Section 115JB of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (the Act). Facts of the case During the Assessment Year 2008-09, the taxpayer earned dividend income and a share of profit from its partnership firm which was exempt

 Unexplained Jewellery placed in locker shall be assessed in year of opening of locker by revenue

 IT: In terms of section 69A, assessee would be treated in possession of jewellery, from date of opening of locker, i.e., when jewellery was found and seized by revenue, and would be added to his income accordingly. This is an Appeal by the Assessee directed against the Order by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-41, Mumbai (‘CIT(A)’ for short) dated 24.01.2011, confirming the levy of penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’ hereinafter) for Assessment Year (AY) 2007

  1. 194H Discount by telecom companies to distributors on recharge coupons is commission, liable for TDS: HC

Hutchison Telecom East Ltd. vs. CIT (Calcutta High Court), Income tax (Appeal) no. 347 of 2006, Date of Judgment: 12/05/2015 Brief of the Case Calcutta High Court held In the case of Hutchison Telecom East Ltd. vs. CIT that the discount allowed to the distributors in respect of starter packs and recharge coupons for its prepaid services will be covered under commission or brokerage, liable to TDS u/s 194H. The terms and conditions of the agreement between the parties leave no manner

Burden of proof on assessee to prove creditworthiness & genuineness of creditors: HC

CIT vs. Mihir Kanti Hazra (Calcutta High Court), Income tax (Appeal) no. 46 of 2015, Date of Judgment: 28/04/2015 Brief of the Case Calcutta High Court held In the case of CIT vs. Mihir Kanti Hazra that it is well settled that creditworthiness of the alleged creditors and the source of the source are relevant enquiries. In the case of CIT Vs Precision Finance Pvt. Ltd. reported in (1994) 208 ITR 465, it was decided that It is for the assessee to prove the identity of the creditors, their

Non submission of available proof by the party will be treated as proof against him: HC

Late Sushil Modi vs.CIT (Calcutta High Court), Income tax (Appeal) no. 52 of 2003,  Date of Judgment: 01/04/2015 Brief of the Case Calcutta High Court held In the case of Late Sushil Modi vs.CIT that the contention of the assessee that he need not prove his case and the assessing officer is bound to find corroboration by making independent enquiry is neither based on law nor is supported by reason. The case is clearly covered by Clause – (g) of Section 114 of the Evidence Act which provides

Interest on Excess Income Tax Paid by Taxpayer i.e. on Income Tax Refund

Many times it may happen that the taxpayer has paid excess tax as against the tax required to be paid by him. In such a case he is granted refund of the excess tax paid by him. In this part you can gain knowledge about various provisions relating to claim of refund of excess tax paid by the taxpayer. Basic provisions When the tax paid by the taxpayer (could be in the form of advance tax or tax deducted/collected at source or self-assessment tax or payment of tax on regular assessment) is more

Indirect Tax

Levy of services charges on e-tickets doesn’t amount to abuse of dominance position by Railways

E-ticketing facility in Railways is an additional value added service offered by IRCTC and any customer wishing to avoid payment of service charges may not register himself with IRCTC but can book tickets through manual PRS counters without paying any service charge and, therefore, levy of service charges on e-tickets does not amount to an abuse of dominant position by Railways Facts: 1. The information in this case was filed under section 19(1)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002 („the Act‟) by

Company Law

Extend last date for filing of form MGT-7 & AOC-4 till 31.12.2015- ICSI

The Ministry of Corporate Affairs vide its notification dated August 28, 2015 amended the provisions of the Companies (Management and Administration) Rules, 2014 and brought out e-form MGT-7 for filing of Annual Return. Also MCA has vide notification dated September 4, 2015 brought Companies (Accounts) Second Amendment Rules, 2015 wherein Form AOC-4; Form AOC-4 CFS (consolidated financial statement) and AOC 4 (XBRL) made available for filing. On July 13, 2015, MCA

Even in case of large scale fraud, recovery can’t be made beyond 5 years of relevant date

Where allegations of cheating and fraud had been levelled against partners of company, regarding which FIR had been registered in Delhi, Delhi Court had summoned accused and Magistrate at Delhi had taken cognizance of matter, petitioners could not have approached a different High Court for quashing of complaint. 1. This is a petition filed under Section 446 of the Companies Act read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of FIR No. RC-BD- 1/2000/e/0005 and Sections 120-B, 420, 467,

Co. can’t refuse to register share transfer if transfer deed and succession certificate are furnished

Where respondent group had furnished succession certificate as well as transfer deed executed in their favour, they were clearly entitled to have rectification made by getting shares registered in their favour. 1. The question raised in these appeals relates to the scope of power under Section 111 of the Companies Act, 1956, to direct rectification in the share register of a company. The question has to be examined in the context of correctness of the view taken in the impugned order passed by the

SEBI

Sebi exempts government from making open offer in Indian Overseas Bank case

Capital markets regulator Sebi today exempted government from making open offer to pick up an additional stake in Indian Overseas Bank through preferential allotments. The central government, which is the promoter of the bank, has proposed to acquire more than 48.56 crore shares of Indian Overseas Bank (IOB) following a proposed preferential allotment by the lender. The government presently holds 73.80 per cent stake in the bank and the proposed allotment of shares would

http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/markets/stocks/policy/sebi-exempts-government-from-making-open-offer-in-indian-overseas-bank-case/articleshow/49420166.cms

RBI

Banks’ loans rose 9.5% YoY in two weeks to Oct 2: RBI

Indian banks’ loans rose 9.5 percent in the two weeks to Oct. 2 from a year earlier, while deposits rose 11.3 percent, the Reserve Bank of India’s weekly statistical supplement showed on Friday. Outstanding loans rose 1.24 trillion rupees (USD 19.15 billion) to 68.30 trillion rupees in the two weeks to Oct. 2. Non-food credit rose 1.39 trillion rupees to 67.43 trillion rupees, while food credit fell 152.80 billion rupees to 874.60 billion rupees. Bank deposits rose 2.04 trillion rupees to 91.64 trillion rup

http://www.moneycontrol.com/news/economy/banks-loans-rose-95-yoytwo-weeks-to-oct-2-rbi_3637241.html?utm_source=ref_article

RBI back to mopping up foreign exchange through spot route

After being a net seller in the spot foreign exchange market in August, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) turned net buyer in September once again. The trend continued in October with the central bank mopping up flows thanks to enhancement in foreign portfolio investors’ (FPIs) investment limit in Indian debt. According to a senior treasury official of a public sector bank, RBI had sold foreign exchange in early September to stem excess volatility, an effect of rout in global mar  [….] Read more at:

http://www.business-standard.com/article/finance/rbi-back-to-mopping-up-foreign-exchange-through-spot-route-115101600959_1.html

RBI to take close look at banks’ asset quality: Raghuram Rajan 

Reserve Bank of India Governor Raghuram Rajan said on Thursday the central bank would take a close look at the asset quality of lenders, while calling on them to recognise all bad loans and put assets back to work after talking with company promoters. The comments are the latest by Rajan pushing lenders to deal with their pile of non-performing assets as the government pushes for increased corporate investments. Rajan said the central bank was also working with the government to find

http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/finance/rbi-to-take-close-look-at-banks-asset-quality-raghuram-rajan/articleshow/49386630.cms

Etailers like Snapdeal seek RBI approval to offer loans to SMEs 

Some of the top etailers operating in India have sought the Reserve Bank of India’s permission to lend to small and medium enterprises listed on their platforms. Asenior RBI official said some suggestions were made at a town hall organised by the central bank in Delhi for ecommerce companies and small and medium enterprises (SMEs). “There were some suggestions made in this regard, and we have forwarded them to the head office. They are being looked at,” he said, requesting anonym

http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/49395754.cms?utm_source=contentofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst

Rs 2,000 crore fund to push financial inclusion: RBI

RBI today announced merger of two funds to create a new Financial Inclusion Fund with a corpus of Rs 2,000 crore to support ‘developmental and promotional activities’ for expanding reach of banking services. After completion of initial five years, RBI said it has now been decided to merge both the Financial Inclusion Fund and Financial Inclusion Technology Fund into a single Fund — Financial Inclusion Fund (FIF). “The overall corpus of the new FIF will be Rs 2,000 crore. Contribution

http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/49388643.cms?utm_source=contentofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst

Miscellaneous Laws

Supreme Court permits ‘voluntary’ use of Aadhar cards in welfare schemes

Lifting its earlier restriction, the Supreme today permitted voluntary use of Aadhaar cards in welfare schemes that also included MGNREGA, all pension schemes and the provident fund besides ambitious flagship programmes like ‘Pradhan Mantri Jan Dhan Yojna’ of the NDA government. The social welfare schemes, aimed at reaching to the door steps of the “poorest of the poor”, were in addition to LPG and PDS schemes in which the apex court had allowed the voluntary use of Aadhaar

http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-supreme-court-permits-voluntary-use-of-aadhar-cards-in-welfare-schemes-2135391

FAQs on Non Banking Financial Company – Micro Finance Institutions

What is an NBFC-MFI? Ans. An NBFC-MFI is defined as a non-deposit taking NBFC (other than a company licensed under Section 25 of the Indian Companies Act, 1956) with Minimum Net Owned Funds of Rs.5 crore (for NBFC-MFIs registered in the North Eastern Region of the country, it will be Rs. 2 crore) and having not less than 85% of its net assets as “qualifying assets”. Q2. What are the documents required for registration as NBFC-MFI? Ans. The checklist with respect to application for

http://onlinelawsolutions.blogspot.in/2015/10/faqs-on-non-banking-financial-company.html

Labour Ministry goes all-out to get House nod for EPF amendments 

Keen to push through amendments to the Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, in the upcoming winter session of Parliament, the Labour Ministry held power-packed consultations with a group of ministers this week to firm up its position. The legislation, among others, seeks to offer workers in the formal sector a chance to choose between the EPF scheme and the New Pension Scheme. The meeting was attended by Home Minister Rajnath Singh, Finance Mi  [….] Read more at:

http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/49438190.cms?utm_source=contentofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst

Economy & News

Drivers’ facilities called highway villages may become mandatory in new highway contracts 

India is proposing to introduce a new stiff clause in highway contracts that will make it mandatory for developers to provide for facilities for drivers, called highway villages, on the lines of international norms. “The concept of highway villages is quite popular internationally…. The government is keen on developing quality infrastructure that is in tune with current times and will also create employment opportunities for local people,” a road transport ministry official told ET. Detailed project reports

http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/49446035.cms?utm_source=contentofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst

Trade Unions slam government proposal to set up factory workers’ panel 

In what could affect the government’s plan to set up an independent mechanism to deal with the terms and conditions covering factory workers, trade unions have slammed the proposal saying that giving sweeping powers to the board will be detrimental to the employees. As part of the amendments to the Factories Act, 1948, the labour ministry had proposed constituting an Occupational Safety and Health Board of India, comprising a chairman and two members appointed by the gove

http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/49446029.cms?utm_source=contentofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst

Trade Ministers to meet next week ahead of India-Africa Summit 

Trade ministers from several African nations will converge here for the India Africa Trade Ministers’ Meeting (IATMM) on October 23 in the run-up to the India-Africa Summit to discuss ways to bolster trade ties with India and fast-track regional agreements. Representatives from 54 African nations, including heads of state of some 40 countries, and the powerful African Union are expected to participate in the four-day summit beginning October 26. “Prior to the forum summit, the

http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/49438135.cms?utm_source=contentofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst

‘King of nuts’ from California to conquer India? 

Kashmiri and Californian walnuts can co-exist in the booming Indian market with American growers of the healthy dry fruit eyeing it in a big way after exports to the traditionally-strong Chinese market dropped amid a slowdown in the world’s second-largest economy. “We are excited about the Indian market and feel it holds great potential for our industry,” Chief Executive Officer of California Walnut Commission (CWC), Dennis A Balint, said. “What is most encouraging is that I

http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/49440516.cms?utm_source=contentofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst

Pension regulator seeks government support to widen subscriber base 

After achieving a new milestone in AUM and subscriber base early this month, the Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority (PFRDA) is looking for some fiscal support from the government for its ongoing move to expand subscriber base further. The asset under management (AUM) of its national pension system (NPS) has crossed Rs 1-trillion-mark in the first week of October at around Rs 1,10,000 crore, while the NPS subscriber base also crossed 1 crore-mark in the

http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/49438535.cms?utm_source=contentofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances; Hope the information will assist you in your Professional endeavors. For query or help, contact:info@caindelhiindia.com or call at 011-23343333

 

July 7, 2021 / Company Law Compliances

CORPORATE BULLETINS FOR THE MONTH OF OCT 2015

CORPORATE BULLETINS FOR THE MONTH OF OCT 2015

 Direct Tax

 CBDT asks AOs to compare tax returns of mining Cos with annual returns to ascertain suppressed stock

 The assessees engaged in the business of mining are required to file a Annual Return with Indian Bureau of Mines (‘IBM’)(Form H-1 in case of Iron Ore mining and Form H-2 to H-8 in case of mining in other Ores). 2. Follow-up enquiries, in regard to some of the companies which find mention in the report of the Justice M.B. Shah Commission of Enquiry, which was constituted by the Government to probe illegal Iron and Manganese Ore mining, shows that in some cases there were significant      [….] Read more at:

 E-biz launches composite application form for PAN, TAN, DIN and incorporation of company

 This joined up service enables the applicant to fill a common form for ‘MCA-COI, CBDT-PAN, TAN, MoLE- ESIC and EPFO’ services and the same is then routed sequentially to the respective department for processing. While applying for these services, eBiz reference number is generated which is used by the applicant for further tracking of application. Once the incorporation forms (INC-7, DIR-12 and INC 22) are sent to MCA, the Registrar of companies issues a certificate of incorporation (CO   [….] Read more at:

 https://www.ebiz.gov.in/joinedupservicesmcacbdt

 Indirect Tax

 Service Tax on services provided in relation to remittance of money to India from overseas

 Whereas, the Central Government is satisfied that in the period commencing on and from the 1st day of July, 2012 and ending with the 13th day of October, 2014 (hereinafter referred to as the said period) according to a practice that was generally prevalent, there was  non–levy of service tax on the services provided by an Indian Bank or other entity acting as an agent to the Money Transfer Service Operators (hereinafter referred to as MTSO),  in relation to remittance of foreign currency    [….] Read more at:

 http://www.cbec.gov.in/htdocs-servicetax/st-notifications/st-notifications-2015/st19-2015

 No service-tax on entrance fee collected by club which doesn’t confer any access to services

 This appeal of M/s Cricket Club of India, Mumbai (CCI) relates to payment of service tax of Rs. 96,06,434, along with interest of Rs. 4,86,855, on the entrance fee of Rs. 9,41,80,745 collected from new members during the period from 16 June 2005 to 30 January 2006. This amount was remitted ‘under protest’ on 27 February 2006 following letters issued by Superintendent of Central Excise (Tax Group XIV), Mumbai in early 2006 consequent upon introduction of levy of tax for rendering of

 Customs- Introduction of electronic messaging for issue of Delivery Order

 As part of Government’s initiatives for improving “Ease of Doing Business”, several facilitation measures are being taken by the Central Board of Excise & Customs. After consultation with stakeholders, it has emerged that introduction of electronic messaging for issue of Delivery Order instead of a paper based Delivery Order will result in considerable simplification in the Customs Clearance process, and can demonstrably reduce transaction costs and time taken in the clearance of Cargo.    [….] Read more at:

 http://www.cbec.gov.in/htdocs-cbec/customs/cs-circulars/cs-circulars-2015/circ24-2015cs

 Rate of exchange of conversion of foreign currency with effect from 16th October, 2015

 In exercise of the powers conferred by section 14 of the Customs Act, 1962 (52 of 1962), and in super session of the notification of the Central Board of Excise & Customs No. 97/2015-CUSTOMS (N.T.), dated 1st October, 2015, except as respects things done or omitted to be done before such supersession, the Central Board of Excise & Customs hereby determines that the rate of exchange of conversion of each of the foreign currencies specified in column (2) of each of Schedule I and  Schedule II annexed hereto, into Indian currency or vice versa, shall, with effect from 1   [….] Read more at:

 http://www.cbec.gov.in/htdocs-cbec/customs/cs-act/notifications/notfns-2015/cs-nt2015/csnt101-2015

 Amendment in the Principal Notification No. 61/94-Custosm(N.T) dated 21.11.1994

 In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (a) of sub-section (1) of  section 7 of the Customs Act, 1962 (52 of 1962), the Central Board of Excise and Customs hereby makes the following further amendments in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) No. 61/94-Customs (N.T.), dated the 21st November, 1994, published in the Gazette of India, vide number S.O. 828 (E), dated the 21st November, 1994, namely:- In the said notification, in the      [….] Read more at:

 http://www.cbec.gov.in/htdocs-cbec/customs/cs-act/notifications/notfns-2015/cs-nt2015/csnt99-2015

 Govt may hike import duty on wheat to 25% to check imports

 The Centre might raise import duty on wheat to 25 per cent — from the current 10 per cent — to restrict overseas purchases when there is surplus domestic stock. In August, the government imposed a 10 per cent import duty on wheat — for the first time since 2006 — after private flour millers started importing from Australia amid sluggish supply of high-protein wheat varieties used to make pastas and pizzas. Millers are resorting to imports despite surplus stocks of other varieties of wheat with FCI,   [….] Read more at:

 http://www.business-standard.com/article/economy-policy/govt-may-hike-import-duty-on-wheat-to-25-to-check-imports-115101400581_1.html

 Company Law

 MCA site to remain closed from 8:00 pm today

 Services on MCA portal will not be available from 16th Oct, 2015 08:00 PM to 19th Oct, 2015 8:00 AM. MCA regrets the inconvenience caused and request the stakeholders to plan accordingly.     [….] Read more at:

 http://www.mca.gov.in/

 Dispute among Shareholder’s nominees after his demise

 Company was incorporated with two groups as shareholders, one group is a family headed by DK Jain and another is headed by Mr. Sushi! Gupta each holding fifty percent shares in the company. After demise of DK Jain on 18.3.2014, the differences have crept into Jain family resulting into family members filing various legal proceedings against each other before various forums fighting for properties DK Jain left behind. Late Shri D.K. Jain has three daughters and one Son, his elder daughter M

 SEBI

 Modus operandi of running CIS through private trust are also within the purview of SEBI, says SAT – Mumbai

 In view of the close proximity between the appellant and the Trustee as also the AMC (appellant itself) no fault can be found with the decision of SEBI in holding that the appellant had adopted a modus operandi of operating CIS through the medium of a Trust. It appears that the appellant was under the erroneous belief that if the CIS operated through a Trust, it would be outside the purview of SEBI and under that erroneous belief the appellant adopted the modus operandi of run

 SEBI asking rating agencies to avoid suspending cos not a ‘right move’

 Market experts have expressed their reservations over a SEBI move asking credit rating agencies (CRAs) to avoid suspension of ratings in the event of companies not providing them the requisite information. SEBI is said to have told CRAs in a meeting last Thursday to devise other methods and submit a draft paper (in 30 days) on these methods, besides continuing their evaluation based on publicly available information, according to a senior rating agency official. The regulator seems to   [….] Read more at:

 http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/todays-paper/tp-markets/sebi-asking-rating-agencies-to-avoid-suspending-cos-not-a-right-move/article7762829.ece

 RBI

 Advance against Pledge of Gold ornaments/jewellery

 Please refer to para 3 of the circulars UBD.CO.BPD.PCB.Cir.No.60/13.05.001/2013- 14 dated May 09, 2014 and RPCD.RRB.RCB.B.C.No.8/03.05.33/2014-15 dated July 01, 2014 wherein it was stipulated that in order to standardize the valuation and make it more transparent to the borrower, gold jewellery accepted as security/ collateral will have to be valued at the average of closing price of 22 carat gold for the preceding 30 days as quoted by Indian Bullion and Jewellers Association Limi    [….] Read more at:

 https://rbidocs.rbi.org.in/rdocs/Notification/PDFs/N207233785FBA8E840B8B995D99BF0EB56A1.PDF

 Financial Inclusion Fund (FIF) – Revised Guidelines

 As you may be aware, the Financial Inclusion Fund (FIF) and Financial Inclusion Technology Fund (FITF) was constituted in the year 2007-08 for a period of five years with a corpus of Rs. 500 crore each to be contributed by Government of India (GOI), RBI and NABARD in the ratio of 40:40:20. The guidelines for these two funds were framed by GOI. In April 2012, RBI decided to fund FIF by transferring the interest differential in excess of 0.5% on RIDF and STCRC deposits on      [….] Read more at:

 https://rbidocs.rbi.org.in/rdocs/Notification/PDFs/F20626C9DE770E5145738FADC7A72EF47DE8.PDF

 Miscellaneous Laws

 ICAI warns students submitting fictitious/forged documents for Exam

 Submission of fictitious/forged documents by students and candidates for Institute’s examinations – attestation by members thereof. The Institute has observed certain instances where students and candidates for Institute’s examination have submitted fictitious / forged documents to the Institute duly attested by members. While the Executive Committee of the Institute has decided that such students/ candidates be debarred from pursuing the Chartered Accountancy course perm

 The Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 As amended by Finance Act, 2015

 An Act to prevent undesirable transactions in securities by regulating the business of dealing therein, 1[***] by providing for certain other matters connected therewith. BE it enacted by Parliament in the Seventh Year of the Republic of India as follows : PRELIMINARY Short title, extent and commencement. 1. (1) This Act may be called the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956. (2) It extends to the whole of India. (3)  It shall come into force on such date2 as the Central Government m

 Admissibility of HRA on non-acceptance or surrender of railway residential accommodation

 Admissibility of House Rent Allowance in the event of non-acceptance or surrender of railway residential accommodation. Ref : PNM-NFIR Item No. 40/2012 During a meeting held on 15.07.2015 with the Board and the NFIR on the subject mentioned above. the Federation pointed out that railway quarters which are unfit for occupation or in a dilapidated condition are being allotted by the railway administration in the Zonal Railways/Units and thereby the affected railway

 Economy & News

 Narendra Modi government presses acceleration switch as reforms start having impact on ground

 India’s economy may be about to turn the corner on the back of robust public spending that’s beginning to have an impact on the ground coupled with strong urban consumer demand, economists and government officials said. Three months of sound industrial growth driven by manufacturing, signs of a pickup in investment, robust indirect tax collections and indications of a mining sector reboot suggest that the government’s attempts to revive the economy through reforms and higher publi   [….] Read more at:

 http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/49394340.cms?utm_source=contentofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst

 SC expands Aadhaar use to pension, PF and Jan Dhan Yojana 

 The Supreme Court on Thursday allowed the government to expand the use of Aadhaar-based verification to a few more services for now, even as it decided to set up a nine-judge bench to consider the legal validity of the biometric identification system. A five-member constitution bench, however, set a key condition to using Aadhaar for releasing pensions, provident fund and dispensing wages under the rural employment scheme through the Prime Minister’s Jan Dhan Yojana. The beneficiary ca   [….] Read more at:

 http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/49396163.cms?utm_source=contentofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst

 Labour law reforms: Narendra Modi government moves afresh for ‘makeover’ of 1948 Factories Act 

 The Narendra Modi-led government is making a fresh attempt at pushing labour law reforms, starting with a ‘complete makeover’ of the 1948 Factories Act to bring it in sync with the government’s plan to boost manufacturing and job creation. In the process, the government has indicated that it is not likely to pursue the passage of amendments to the same law that it had introduced in Parliament last August and were reviewed by a parliamentary panel that submitted its report in December 2014.     [….] Read more at:

 http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/49396382.cms?utm_source=contentofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst

 TPP accord to hit India’s textile exports: Report 

The Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) deal will hit India’s textile exports hard by providing zero-duty access to the US market to Vietnam, says a report today. “TPP is a trade agreement that will open markets and enable countries like Vietnam a zero-duty access to the US market for textiles while Indian players will have to pay 14-32 per cent duty, which will make it uncompetitive. It would have been much better had India too joined TPP,” the CII-Wazir Advisors report said.  The US, Japan a   [….] Read more at:

http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/49393075.cms?utm_source=contentofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst

Digital India: Soon national sample surveys, economic census, other data to be made available for free 

The government is devising ways to ramp up online dissemination of data and make more data available to public for free, an effort that is in line with Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Digital India initiative. The ministry of statistics and programme implementation is in the process of drafting an agenda note in which it has differentiated between data that can and cannot be shared on its website, officials said. It is planning to make the “sharable data” available to everyone for    [….] Read more at:

http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/49394812.cms?utm_source=contentofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances; Hope the information will assist you in your Professional endeavors. For query or help, contact:info@caindelhiindia.com or call at 011-23343333

July 14, 2021 / Accounting Services

Managerial Remuneration in a Company -2 [SCHEDULE XIII] (See section 198, 269, 310 and 311)

Managerial Remuneration in a Company -2 [SCHEDULE XIII] (See section 198, 269, 310 and 311)

[SCHEDULE XIII]

(See section 198, 269, 310 and 311)

Condition to be fulfilled for the appointment of a managing or whole-time director or a manager with out the approval of the Central Government

[PART I]

Appointments

No person shall be eligible for appointment as a managing or whole-time director or a manager (herein after referred to as marginal person) of a company unless he satisfies the following conditions, namely:-

(a) He had not been sentenced to imprisonment for any period, or to a fine exceeding one thousand rupees, for the conviction of an offence under any of the following Acts, namely: –

  • The Indian stamp Act, 1899 (2 of 1899),
  • The Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944 (1 of 1944),
  • The Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951 (65 of 1951),
  • The Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 (37 of 1954),
  • The Essential Commodities Act, 1955 (10 of 1955),
  • The Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956),
  • The Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 (42 of 1956),
  • The Wealth Tex Act, 1957 (27 of 1957),
  • The Income Tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961),
  • The Custom Act, 1962 (52 of 1962),
  • The Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 (54 of 1969),
  • The Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 (46 of 1973),
  • The Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 (1 of 1986),
  • The Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 (15 of 1992),
  • The Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992 (22 of 1992),

(b) He had not been detained for any period under the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 (52 of 1974);

Provided that where Central Government has given its approval to the appointment of a person convicted or detained under sub-paragraph (a) or sub-paragraph (b). as the case may be, no further approval of the central government shall be necessary for the subsequent appointment of that person if he had not been so convicted or detained subsequent to such approval;

(c) He has completed the age of 25 years and has not attained the age of 70 years:

Provided that where-

  • He has not completed the age of 25 years, but has attained the age of majority; or
  • He has attained the age of 70 years; and where his appointment is approved by a special resolution passed by the company in general meeting, no further approval of the Central Government shall be necessary for such appointment

(d) Where he is a managerial person in more than one company he draws remuneration from one or more companies subject to the ceiling provided in section III of Part II;]

(e) He is resident in India.

Explanation 2[I]. – For the purpose of this Schedule, resident in India

Includes a person who has been staying in India for a continuous period of not less than twelve months immediately preceding the date of his appointment as a managerial person and who has come to stay in India, –

  •  For taking up employment in India, or
  • for carrying on a business or vocation in India.

3 [Explanation II. – This condition shall not apply to the companies in Special Economic Zones as notified by Department of Commerce from time to time.

Provided that a person, being a non-resident in India shall enter India only after obtaining a proper employment visa from the concerned Indian mission abroad. For this purpose, such person shall be required to furnish, along with the visa application form, profile of the Company, the principal employer and terms and conditions of such person’s appointment.]

PART II

Remuneration

Section I. – Remuneration payable by companies having profits

Subject to the provisions of section 198 and section 309, a company having profits in a financial year may pay any remuneration, by way of salary, dearness allowance, perquisites, commission and other allowances, which shall not exceed five percent of its net profits for one such managerial person, and if there is more than one such managerial person, ten percent for all of them together.

Section II. – Remuneration payable by companies having no profits or inadequate profits.

1[I. Notwithstanding anything contained in this Part, where in any financial year during the currency of tenure of the managerial person, a company has no profits or its profits are inadequate, it may pay remuneration to a managerial person by way of salary, dearness allowance, perquisites and any other allowances-

(A) not exceeding the ceiling limit of Rs. 2400000 per annum or Rs. 200000 per month calculated on the following scale:-

Where the effective capital  Of Company is Monthly remuneration payable shall not exceed (Rupees)

  • less than rupees 1 crore                                                            75000
  • rupees 1 crore or more but less than rupees 5 crores        100000
  • rupees 5 crores or more but less than rupees 25 crores    125000
  • rupees 25 crores or more but less than rupees 50 crores  150000
  • rupees 50 crores or more but less than Rupees 100 crs   175000
  • rupees 100 crores or more                                                      200000

Provided that the ceiling limits specified under this sub paragraph shall apply, if –

  • payment of remuneration is approved by a resolution passed by the Remuneration Committee;
  • the company has not made any default in repayment of any of its debts (including public deposits) or debentures or interest payable thereon for a continuous period of thirty days in the preceding financial year before the date of appointment of such managerial person.

(B)Not exceeding the ceiling limit of Rs. 4800000 per annum or Rs. 400000 per month calculated on the following scale:-

Where the effective capital   Of Company is Monthly remuneration Payable shall not exceed (Rupees)

  • Less than rupees 1 crore                                                            150000
  • rupees 1 crore or more but less than rupees  crores           200000
  • rupees 5 crores or more but less than rupees 25 crores     250000
  • rupees 25 crores or more but less than rupees 50 crores  300000
  • rupees 50 crores or more but less than rupees 100 crore 350000
  • rupees 100 crores or more                                                       400000

Provided that  the ceiling limit specified under this paragraph shall apply, if-

  • payment of remuneration is approved by a resolution passed by the Remuneration Committee;Provided that the ceiling limits specified under this sub-paragraph shall apply, if –
  • The company has not made any default in repayment of any of its debts (including public deposits) or debentures or interest payable thereon for a continuous period of thirty days in the preceding financial year before the date of appointment of such managerial person;
  • A special resolution has been passed at the general meeting of the company for payment of remuneration for a period not exceeding three years;
  • A statement along with a notice calling the general meeting referred to in clause (iii) is given to the shareholders containing the following, namely:-

 I.General Information;

  • Nature of industry-
  • Date or expected date of commencement of commercial production.
  • In case of new companies, expected date of commencement of activities as per project approved by financial institutions appearing in the prospectus.
  • Financial performance based on given indicators.
  • Export performance and net foreign exchange collaborations.
  • Foreign investments or collaborators, if any.

 II.Information about the appointee:

  • Background details.
  • Past remuneration.
  • Recognition or awards.
  • Job profile and his suitability.
  • Remuneration proposed.
  • Comparative remuneration profile with respect to industry, size of the company,profile of the position and person (in case of expatriates the relevant details would be w.r.t. the country of his origin.)
  • Pecuniary relationship directly or indirectly with the company, or relationship with the managerial personal, if any.

III.Other Information:

  • Reason of loss or inadequate profits.
  • Steps taken or proposed to be taken for improvement.
  • Expected increase in productivity and profits in measurable terms.                          

 IV.  Disclosures:

(A)The shareholders of the company shall be informed of the remuneration package of      the managerial person.

(B)The following disclosures shall be mentioned in the Board of Directors report under       the heading “Corporate Governance”, if any, attached to the annual report: –

  • All elements of remuneration package such as salary, benefits, bonuses, stock   options, pension, etc. of all the directors;
  • Details of fixed component and performance linked incentives along with the performance criteria;
  • Service contracts, notice period, severance fees;
  • Stock option details, if and, and whether the same has been issued at a discount as well as the period over which accrued and over which exercisable.

Continue reading “Managerial Remuneration in a Company -2 [SCHEDULE XIII] (See section 198, 269, 310 and 311)” →

Posts navigation

  • Previous
  • 1
  • 2

Enquire Now

    About IFCCL

    India Financial Consultancy Corporation Pvt. Ltd. is one of the leading providers of financial and business advisory, internal audit, statutory audit, corporate governance, and tax and regulatory services. With a global approach to service delivery, we are responds to clients' complex business challenges with a broad range of services across industry sectors and national boundaries. The Company has been set up by a group of young, enthusiastic, highly skilled and motivated professionals who have taken experience from top consulting companies and are extensively experienced in their chosen fields has providing a wide array of Accounting, Auditing, Assurance, Risk, Taxation, & Business advisory services to various clients and their stakeholders...
    Read More...

    Contact Info

    P-6/90 Connaught Circus,
    Connaught Place,
    New Delhi - 110001, India

    Landline: 011-43520194
    Email: singh@caindelhiindia.com

    RCS Recent Posts

    • Cash Deposits under Presumptive Taxation-Attract Sec 68/69A? June 17, 2025
    • New IBBI Forms LIQ 1–4 in Liquidation Reporting June 17, 2025
    • Overview on Social Engineering- Cyber Jaagrookta Diwas June 17, 2025
    • GSTN: Non-editability of Auto-Populated Liability in GSTR-3B June 16, 2025
    • HSN Code Requirements Based on Annual Turnover June 15, 2025
    • Key deadlines of Compliance Calendar For FY 2025–26 June 15, 2025
    • Key Changes for taxpayers filing under Old Tax Regime June 14, 2025
    • Grievance hand Mechanism for Processing of GST Registration June 3, 2025

    Archives

    • 2025 (114)
    • 2024 (154)
    • 2023 (113)
    • 2022 (121)
    • 2021 (92)
    • 2020 (16)
    • 2017 (5)
    • 2016 (181)
    • 2015 (180)
    • 2014 (1)

    Categories

    • Accounting Services (25)
    • Audit (40)
    • Business Consultancy (31)
    • Business Registration Services (14)
    • Business Services (11)
    • Business Set Up in India (30)
    • Business Set Up Outside India (5)
    • Business Strategy (37)
    • CA (4)
    • CBDT (29)
    • Certification (1)
    • CFO Services (10)
    • Chartered Accountant (31)
    • Company Law Compliances (232)
    • Company Registration (9)
    • compliance calendar (9)
    • CORPORATE AND PROFESSIONAL UPDATE (7)
    • Corporate Updates (15)
    • Cryptocurrency (15)
    • DGFT (3)
    • Digital Signature Certificate (1)
    • Direct Tax (92)
      • ITR (23)
    • DTAA (14)
    • FCRA (7)
    • FDI (9)
    • Fixed Asset Register Related Services (4)
    • Foreign Exchange Management Act (59)
    • GST (120)
    • GST Compliance (61)
    • GST Registration (14)
    • IBC (33)
    • IEC (4)
    • INCOME TAX (310)
    • Indirect Tax (218)
    • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (1)
    • Intellectual Property Rights (5)
    • Knowledge Management (60)
    • NBFC (5)
    • NGO (14)
    • NRI (24)
    • Others (10)
    • PAN TAN Aadhar (1)
    • Project Finance (22)
    • RBI Consultancy (12)
    • SEBI Compliances (38)
    • SEZ (2)
    • Social Auditor (1)
    • TDS (40)
    • Transfer Pricing (4)
    • Uncategorized (87)
    • Virtual Office Facility (4)
    • XBRL Data Conversion Services (2)

    Follow Us On

    Follow us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter Join us on Linkedin Blogger Google Plus

    © 2025 India Financial Consultancy