{"id":3950,"date":"2021-09-20T13:40:43","date_gmt":"2021-09-20T13:40:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.caindelhiindia.com\/blog\/?p=3950"},"modified":"2021-09-20T13:48:00","modified_gmt":"2021-09-20T13:48:00","slug":"application-of-gst-on-contribution-by-rwa-members","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.caindelhiindia.com\/blog\/application-of-gst-on-contribution-by-rwa-members\/","title":{"rendered":"Application of GST on Contribution By RWA Members"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\" wp-image-3954\" src=\"https:\/\/www.caindelhiindia.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/GST-on-RWA..jpg\" alt=\"GST on RWA.\" width=\"990\" height=\"520\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.caindelhiindia.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/GST-on-RWA..jpg 670w, https:\/\/www.caindelhiindia.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/GST-on-RWA.-300x158.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 990px) 100vw, 990px\" \/><\/p>\n<div id=\"ez-toc-container\" class=\"ez-toc-v2_0_58 counter-hierarchy ez-toc-counter ez-toc-grey ez-toc-container-direction\">\n<p class=\"ez-toc-title\">Table of Contents<\/p>\n<label for=\"ez-toc-cssicon-toggle-item-69d29a2a54ad1\" class=\"ez-toc-cssicon-toggle-label\"><span class=\"\"><span class=\"eztoc-hide\" style=\"display:none;\">Toggle<\/span><span class=\"ez-toc-icon-toggle-span\"><svg style=\"fill: #999;color:#999\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" class=\"list-377408\" width=\"20px\" height=\"20px\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" fill=\"none\"><path d=\"M6 6H4v2h2V6zm14 0H8v2h12V6zM4 11h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2zM4 16h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2z\" fill=\"currentColor\"><\/path><\/svg><svg style=\"fill: #999;color:#999\" class=\"arrow-unsorted-368013\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" width=\"10px\" height=\"10px\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" version=\"1.2\" baseProfile=\"tiny\"><path d=\"M18.2 9.3l-6.2-6.3-6.2 6.3c-.2.2-.3.4-.3.7s.1.5.3.7c.2.2.4.3.7.3h11c.3 0 .5-.1.7-.3.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7zM5.8 14.7l6.2 6.3 6.2-6.3c.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7c-.2-.2-.4-.3-.7-.3h-11c-.3 0-.5.1-.7.3-.2.2-.3.5-.3.7s.1.5.3.7z\"\/><\/svg><\/span><\/span><\/label><input type=\"checkbox\"  id=\"ez-toc-cssicon-toggle-item-69d29a2a54ad1\"  aria-label=\"Toggle\" \/><nav><ul class='ez-toc-list ez-toc-list-level-1 ' ><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-1\" href=\"https:\/\/www.caindelhiindia.com\/blog\/application-of-gst-on-contribution-by-rwa-members\/#Read_about_the_Application_of_GST_on_Contribution_By_RWA_Members\" title=\"Read about the Application of GST on Contribution By RWA Members\">Read about the Application of GST on Contribution By RWA Members<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3'><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-2\" href=\"https:\/\/www.caindelhiindia.com\/blog\/application-of-gst-on-contribution-by-rwa-members\/#BRIEF_INTRODUCTION\" title=\"BRIEF INTRODUCTION\">BRIEF INTRODUCTION<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-3\" href=\"https:\/\/www.caindelhiindia.com\/blog\/application-of-gst-on-contribution-by-rwa-members\/#GOVERNING_CASE_STUDY\" title=\"GOVERNING CASE STUDY\">GOVERNING CASE STUDY<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-4\" href=\"https:\/\/www.caindelhiindia.com\/blog\/application-of-gst-on-contribution-by-rwa-members\/#BRIEF_FACTS\" title=\"BRIEF FACTS\">BRIEF FACTS<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-5\" href=\"https:\/\/www.caindelhiindia.com\/blog\/application-of-gst-on-contribution-by-rwa-members\/#ISSUES_IN_RESPECT_OF_GST_ON_CONTRIBUTION_BY_RESIDENTIAL_WELFARE_ASSOCIATION_FROM_ITS_MEMBERS_%E2%80%93\" title=\"ISSUES IN RESPECT OF GST ON CONTRIBUTION BY RESIDENTIAL WELFARE ASSOCIATION FROM ITS MEMBERS &#8211;\">ISSUES IN RESPECT OF GST ON CONTRIBUTION BY RESIDENTIAL WELFARE ASSOCIATION FROM ITS MEMBERS &#8211;<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-6\" href=\"https:\/\/www.caindelhiindia.com\/blog\/application-of-gst-on-contribution-by-rwa-members\/#RELEVANT_LEGAL_EXTRACTS\" title=\"RELEVANT LEGAL EXTRACTS\">RELEVANT LEGAL EXTRACTS<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-7\" href=\"https:\/\/www.caindelhiindia.com\/blog\/application-of-gst-on-contribution-by-rwa-members\/#CONTENTION_OF_THE_PETITIONER\" title=\"CONTENTION OF THE PETITIONER\">CONTENTION OF THE PETITIONER<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-8\" href=\"https:\/\/www.caindelhiindia.com\/blog\/application-of-gst-on-contribution-by-rwa-members\/#CONTENTION_OF_THE_RESPONDENT\" title=\"CONTENTION OF THE RESPONDENT\">CONTENTION OF THE RESPONDENT<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-9\" href=\"https:\/\/www.caindelhiindia.com\/blog\/application-of-gst-on-contribution-by-rwa-members\/#ANALYSIS_BY_HONBLE_HIGH_COURT_OF_MADRAS\" title=\"ANALYSIS BY HON\u2019BLE\u00a0HIGH COURT\u00a0OF MADRAS\">ANALYSIS BY HON\u2019BLE\u00a0HIGH COURT\u00a0OF MADRAS<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-10\" href=\"https:\/\/www.caindelhiindia.com\/blog\/application-of-gst-on-contribution-by-rwa-members\/#FINAL_DECISION_BY_HONBLE_MADRAS_HIGH_COURT\" title=\"FINAL DECISION BY HON\u2019BLE MADRAS\u00a0HIGH COURT\">FINAL DECISION BY HON\u2019BLE MADRAS\u00a0HIGH COURT<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><\/ul><\/nav><\/div>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Read_about_the_Application_of_GST_on_Contribution_By_RWA_Members\"><\/span><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">Read about the Application of <a style=\"color: #ff0000;\" href=\"https:\/\/carajput.com\/blog\/resident-welfare-association-housing-society-under-gst-2\/\">GST on Contribution By RWA Members<\/a><\/span><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<h3><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"BRIEF_INTRODUCTION\"><\/span><span style=\"color: #000080;\">BRIEF INTRODUCTION<\/span><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n<p>With the introduction of GST in 2017, Entry 77 was introduced via Notification No. 12\/2017-CT dated June 28, 2017. As per the notification, exemption was granted in respect of contribution, being received by RWAs in\u00a0way over\u00a0Rs. 7,500. As per the clarifications issued by CBIC,\u00a0it was provided that GST will be leviable on consideration made in\u00a0excess of\u00a0Rs. 7,500.<\/p>\n<p>However,\u00a0afterward\u00a0an RWA filed an application before the Authority of Advance Ruling\u00a0to hunt\u00a0clarification\u00a0in this\u00a0matter. Hon\u2019ble AAR held adverse and stated that exemption\u00a0is offered\u00a0as long as\u00a0contribution is received up to Rs. 7,500. Therefore, If the contribution amount exceeds Rs. 7,500 then\u00a0the whole\u00a0contribution\u00a0is\u00a0susceptible to\u00a0GST. If an excess amount is received then\u00a0the whole\u00a0contribution would be\u00a0susceptible to\u00a0GST. Therefore, a petition was filed by the petitioner before Hon\u2019ble\u00a0high court, thereby challenging the validity of Ruling of AAR and Circular being\u00a0issued by CBIC.<\/p>\n<table style=\"height: 876px;\" width=\"977\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"46\"><em>(1)<\/em><\/td>\n<td width=\"159\"><em>(2)<\/em><\/td>\n<td width=\"258\"><em>(3)<\/em><\/td>\n<td width=\"90\"><em>(4)<\/em><\/td>\n<td width=\"150\"><em>(5)<\/em><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"46\"><em>SL. NO.<\/em><\/td>\n<td width=\"159\"><em>CHAPTER, SECTION, HEADING, GROUP OR SERVICE CODE (TARIFF)<\/em><\/td>\n<td width=\"258\"><em>DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES<\/em><\/td>\n<td width=\"90\"><em>RATE (PER CENT.)<\/em><\/td>\n<td width=\"150\"><em>CONDITION<\/em><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"46\"><em>1<\/em><\/td>\n<td width=\"159\"><em>\u2026\u2026\u2026<\/em><\/td>\n<td width=\"258\"><em>\u00a0<\/em><\/td>\n<td width=\"90\"><em>\u00a0<\/em><\/td>\n<td width=\"150\"><em>\u00a0<\/em><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"46\"><em>77<\/em><\/td>\n<td width=\"159\"><em>HEADING 9995<\/em><\/td>\n<td width=\"258\"><em>SERVICE RENDERED BY AN UNINCORPORATED ENTITY OR NGO REGISTERED UNDER THE LAW FOR TIME BEING IN FORCE, IN RESPECT OF ITS OWN MEMBERS IN THE FORM OF CONTRIBUTION OR REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES &#8211; <\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>(A) AS A TRADE UNION;<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>(B) IN RESPECT OF CARRYING OUT ANY ACTIVITY, BEING EXEMPT FROM THE GST; OR<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>(C) UP TO AN AMOUNT OF RS. 7,500 PER MONTH IN RESPECT OF EACH MEMBER, FOR SUPPLY OF GOODS OR SERVICES FROM A THIRD PERSON AND THE SAME IS MADE FOR A COMMON USE OF ITS MEMBERS.<\/em><\/td>\n<td width=\"90\"><em>NIL<\/em><\/td>\n<td width=\"150\"><em>NIL<\/em><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>Entry No. 78 Services by an artist<\/p>\n<table style=\"height: 803px;\" width=\"970\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"53\"><em>(1)<\/em><\/td>\n<td width=\"172\"><em>(2)<\/em><\/td>\n<td width=\"242\"><em>(3)<\/em><\/td>\n<td width=\"125\"><em>(4)<\/em><\/td>\n<td width=\"126\"><em>(5)<\/em><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"53\"><em>SL. NO.<\/em><\/td>\n<td width=\"172\"><em>CHAPTER, SECTION, HEADING, GROUP OR SERVICE CODE (TARIFF)<\/em><\/td>\n<td width=\"242\"><em>DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES<\/em><\/td>\n<td width=\"125\"><em>RATE <\/em><\/td>\n<td width=\"126\"><em>CONDITION<\/em><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"53\"><em>1<\/em><\/td>\n<td width=\"172\"><em>\u2026\u2026\u2026<\/em><\/td>\n<td width=\"242\"><\/td>\n<td width=\"125\"><\/td>\n<td width=\"126\"><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"53\"><em>78<\/em><\/td>\n<td width=\"172\"><em>9996<\/em><\/td>\n<td width=\"242\"><em>SERVICES RENDERED BY AN ARTIST, IN THE FORM OF PERFORMANCE IN FOLK OR CLASSICAL ART LIKE &#8211;<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>(A) MUSIC, OR<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>(B) DANCE, OR<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>(C) THEATRE,<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>WHERE THE CONSIDERATION CHARGED DOES NOT EXCEED RS. 1,50,000:<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>PROVIDED THE SAID SERVICE IS NOT PROVIDED BY ARTIST AS A BRAND AMBASSADOR.<\/em><\/td>\n<td width=\"125\"><em>NIL<\/em><\/td>\n<td width=\"126\"><em>NIL<\/em><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<h3><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"GOVERNING_CASE_STUDY\"><\/span><span style=\"color: #000080;\">GOVERNING CASE STUDY<\/span><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n<p>It was held by the Hon\u2019ble\u00a0high court, that the words employed in Entry 77, \u2018up to\u2019 an amount of Rs.7,500\/-, are to be interpreted, that any contribution, being in\u00a0excess of\u00a0said amount, shall be\u00a0susceptible to\u00a0GST. It means that the amount up to Rs. 7,500\/- would be exempt from the application of GST. Therefore, The clarification by the GST Department\u00a0at the same time as\u00a0early as in 2017 has taken\u00a0the right\u00a0view.<\/p>\n<h3><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"BRIEF_FACTS\"><\/span><span style=\"color: #000080;\">BRIEF FACTS<\/span><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n<ol>\n<li>A petition was filed by RWA against an Advance Ruling, wherein it was held that GST would be leviable on the whole amount of contribution received by RWA from its members.<\/li>\n<li>After the introduction of GST, an exemption was provided in respect of contribution made by the members of RWA and the same was provided by the Notification 12\/17- CT dated 28.06.2017. Thus, an exemption would be provided where such contribution does not exceed Rs. 5,000 per month per member. However, vide Notification No.2\/18 dated 25.01.2018, the said limit of Rs. 5,000 was raised to Rs. 7,500.<\/li>\n<li>Therefore, exemption be granted in respect of contributions made to RWA and the same be available to Rs. 7,500\/- per month per member.<\/li>\n<li>In many cases, RWA received contributions in\u00a0more than\u00a0Rs. 7,500. In such situation, question arose that:<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<ul>\n<li>Whether\u00a0just in case\u00a0the amount of contribution exceeds Rs. 7,500, the RWA will not have the advantage of\u00a0exemption, and hence, the entire contribution of Rs. 7,500 would be taxable under GST; or<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ol start=\"6\">\n<li>In Initial period, GST Department issued clarification\u00a0just in case\u00a0of Co-operative Housing Society wherein\u00a0it had been\u00a0specifically mentioned that GST would be applicable on consideration received in\u00a0far more than\u00a0Rs. 7,500.<\/li>\n<li>Therefore, considering the clarification, all RWAs were levying GST on contributions received accordingly.<\/li>\n<li>However, in 2009,\u00a0one among\u00a0the petitioners approached the Authority of advance ruling seeking clarification on this matter.<\/li>\n<li>Hon\u2019ble AAR held adverse and stated that exemption\u00a0is available\u00a0given that\u00a0contribution is received up to INR 7,500. If contribution amount exceeds INR 7,500 then entitlement of exemption would stand defeated\u00a0and full\u00a0contribution\u00a0are going to be\u00a0susceptible to\u00a0GST.<\/li>\n<li>After the ruling of Hon\u2019ble AAR, CBIC, it was clarified that exemption in respect of contribution\u00a0made up to an amount of Rs. 7,500 would be exempt. However, in case of excess amount is received, the entire amount of contribution would be\u00a0susceptible to\u00a0GST.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<h3><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"ISSUES_IN_RESPECT_OF_GST_ON_CONTRIBUTION_BY_RESIDENTIAL_WELFARE_ASSOCIATION_FROM_ITS_MEMBERS_%E2%80%93\"><\/span><span style=\"color: #000080;\"><strong>ISSUES IN RESPECT OF GST ON CONTRIBUTION BY RESIDENTIAL WELFARE ASSOCIATION FROM ITS MEMBERS &#8211;<\/strong><\/span><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n<table style=\"height: 470px;\" width=\"946\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"62\"><em>SL. NO.<\/em><\/td>\n<td width=\"265\"><em>ISSUE<\/em><\/td>\n<td width=\"383\"><em>CLARIFICATION<\/em><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"62\"><em>1.<\/em><\/td>\n<td width=\"265\"><em>\u2026\u2026..<\/em><\/td>\n<td width=\"383\"><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"62\"><em>5.<\/em><\/td>\n<td width=\"265\"><em>HOW SHOULD THE RWA CALCULATE GST PAYABLE WHERE THE MAINTENANCE CHARGES EXCEED <\/em><em>\u20b9<\/em><em> 7500\/- PER MONTH PER MEMBER? IS THE GST PAYABLE ONLY ON THE AMOUNT EXCEEDING <\/em><em>\u20b9<\/em><em> 7500\/- OR ON THE ENTIRE AMOUNT OF MAINTENANCE CHARGES?<\/em><\/td>\n<td width=\"383\"><em>GST EXEMPTION IN RESPECT OF MAINTENANCE CHARGES RECEIVED BY RWA FROM ITS MEMBERS WOULD BE AVAILABLE PROVIDED THE AMOUNT DOES NOT EXCEED RS. 7500\/- PER MONTH PER MEMBER.<\/em><em>\u00a0<\/em><em> WHERE THE SAID AMOUNT OF CHARGES EXCEEDS RS. 7500\/- PER MONTH PER MEMBER, THE WHOLE AMOUNT OF CONSIDERATION WOULD TAXED UNDER GST.\u00a0 FOR EXAMPLE, IF THE MAINTENANCE CHARGES ARE <\/em><em>\u20b9<\/em><em> 9000\/- PER MONTH PER MEMBER, GST @ 18% SHALL BE PAYABLE ON THE ENTIRE AMOUNT OF <\/em><em>\u20b9<\/em><em> 9000\/- AND NOT ON (<\/em><em>\u20b9<\/em><em> 9000<\/em><em>\u20b9<\/em><em> 7500) = <\/em><em>\u20b9<\/em><em> 1500\/-<\/em><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<ol start=\"11\">\n<li>Aggrieved with the circular of CBIC and ruling of AAR, a petitioner filed a petition (W.P.No.27100 of 2019) before the Hon\u2019ble\u00a0Madras high court, challenging the Circular No.109\/28\/2019 dated 22.07.2019, in respect of difficulty\u00a0of levying of GST on\u00a0the amount of contribution received by RWA.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<h3><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"RELEVANT_LEGAL_EXTRACTS\"><\/span><span style=\"color: #000080;\"><strong>RELEVANT LEGAL EXTRACTS<\/strong><\/span><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n<ol>\n<li>\u201cDescription of Service\u201d under Entry No. 77 of Notification No. 12\/2017- CT dated 28.06.2017 has been explained herein &#8211;<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>\u201cService by an unincorporated entity or NGO registered under the law, for time in force, to its own members by way of reimbursement of charges or amount of contribution-<\/p>\n<p>(a) as a trade union;<br \/>\n(b) for\u00a0the supply\u00a0of\u00a0completing\u00a0any activity which is exempt from the levy\u00a0of goods\u00a0and service\u00a0tax; or<br \/>\n(c) up to an amount of Rs. 7,500\/- per month for each member, in respect of supply of products\u00a0or services, being received from a 3rd\u00a0person for the common use of its members.\u201d<\/p>\n<ol start=\"2\">\n<li>The extract of the circular later issued by department is as follows &#8211;<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<table width=\"100%\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"6%\"><em>S. NO.<\/em><\/td>\n<td width=\"46%\"><em>ISSUE\u00a0<\/em><\/td>\n<td width=\"47%\"><em>CLARIFICATION<\/em><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"6%\"><em>5.<\/em><\/td>\n<td width=\"46%\"><em>HOW SHOULD THE RWA CALCULATE GST PAYABLE WHERE THE MAINTENANCE CHARGES EXCEED RS.7500\/- PER MONTH PER MEMBER? IS THE GST PAYABLE ONLY ON THE AMOUNT EXCEEDING RS.7500\/- OR ON THE ENTIRE AMOUNT OF MAINTENANCE CHARGES?<\/em><\/td>\n<td width=\"47%\"><em>GST EXEMPTION IN RESPECT OF MAINTENANCE CHARGES RECEIVED BY RWA FROM ITS MEMBERS WOULD BE AVAILABLE PROVIDED THE AMOUNT DOES NOT EXCEED RS. 7500\/- PER MONTH PER MEMBER.<\/em><em>\u00a0<\/em><em> WHERE THE SAID AMOUNT OF CHARGES EXCEEDS RS. 7500\/- PER MONTH PER MEMBER, THE WHOLE AMOUNT OF CONSIDERATION WOULD TAXED UNDER GST.\u00a0 FOR EXAMPLE, IF THE MAINTENANCE CHARGES ARE <\/em><em>\u20b9<\/em><em> 9000\/- PER MONTH PER MEMBER, GST @ 18% SHALL BE PAYABLE ON THE ENTIRE AMOUNT OF <\/em><em>\u20b9<\/em><em> 9000\/- AND NOT ON (<\/em><em>\u20b9<\/em><em> 9000<\/em><em>\u20b9<\/em><em> 7500) = <\/em><em>\u20b9<\/em><em> 1500\/-<\/em><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<h3><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"CONTENTION_OF_THE_PETITIONER\"><\/span><span style=\"color: #000080;\">CONTENTION OF THE PETITIONER<\/span><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n<p>The petitioner contended that:<\/p>\n<p>1. Interpretation made by the Department is believed to be in contrary with the express language and intention of the exemption granted under the circular.<\/p>\n<p>2. Also, according to Article 13(3) of the Constitution of India, the withdrawal of any statutory exemption, by issuance of a circular shall stand in contrary to the provisions of the constitution.<\/p>\n<p>3. Further, based on the initial clarification provided by the Department itself, the petitioner RWAs were required to collect GST only on the amount of contribution in excess of Rs.7,500\/-. However, in a contrary view, it&#8217;d be impossible for the RWAs to gather the shortfall as there would are several changes in ownership of the property, within the interim.<\/p>\n<h3><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"CONTENTION_OF_THE_RESPONDENT\"><\/span><span style=\"color: #000080;\"><strong>CONTENTION OF THE RESPONDENT<\/strong><\/span><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">Ld. Counsel of the Respondent contended that:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">1. Stress was placed on Section 15 of CGST Act, as per which, GST is leviable on transaction value.\u00a0within the\u00a0given case, transaction value is contribution received and it should entirely be taken\u00a0into consideration\u00a0for levying taxes.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">2. Also, exemption\u00a0is supposed\u00a0for middle classes and not for luxury apartments\/their owners.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">3. Also,\u00a0within the\u00a0exemption notification, no slabs are given. Instead, a range\u00a0has been provided, thereby entitling the assessee for exemption.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">4. Also, respondent place reliance on ruling of apex court within the matter of Commissioner of Customs Import, Mumbai V. Dilip Kumar &amp; Company (361 ELT 577) wherein it absolutely was held that within the case of ambiguity in interpretation of a tax exemption provision or Notification, interpretation should be strict and also the burden of proving applicability would fall on the assessee. Therefore, during this case, the exemption provision must be construed strictly and therefore the petitioners are thus not entitled to seek beneficial treatment.<\/p>\n<h3><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"ANALYSIS_BY_HONBLE_HIGH_COURT_OF_MADRAS\"><\/span><span style=\"color: #000080;\">ANALYSIS BY HON\u2019BLE\u00a0HIGH COURT\u00a0OF MADRAS<\/span><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n<p>The Hon\u2019ble\u00a0Madras high court\u00a0made the following analysis &#8211;<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">1.\u00a0Within the\u00a0given cases,\u00a0there&#8217;s\u00a0no ambiguity\u00a0within the\u00a0language of the exemption provision. Therefore, judgment of the Supreme Court in Dilip Kumar (supra)\u00a0wouldn&#8217;t\u00a0be applicable to this\u00a0case.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">2. Intention of exemption notification\u00a0is evident\u00a0that it wants\u00a0to remove\u00a0contribution from the purview of taxation up to an amount of Rs.7,500\/-.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">3. If a comparison is\u00a0applied\u00a0of this exemption with language of other exemptions, then it clearly appears the difference in language adopted by the revenue\u00a0within the\u00a0matter of grant of exemptions.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">4.\u00a0In a very\u00a0case where legislature intended that the exemption shall apply only to cases where\u00a0the number\u00a0charged\u00a0doesn&#8217;t\u00a0exceed a specified pecuniary limit, it states\u00a0the maximum amount, where\u00a0it&#8217;s\u00a0stated that the exemption would be available only where the gross amount of consideration\u00a0doesn&#8217;t\u00a0exceed Rs.5,000\/-\u00a0in a particular\u00a0financial year.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">5. Similarly in entry No. 78 of Notification No.12\/2017 dated 28.06.2017, exemption\u00a0is offered\u00a0to following:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">Services by an artist, in the form of performance in folk or classical art as &#8211;<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 80px;\">(a)\u00a0\u00a0 music, or<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 80px;\">(b)\u00a0 dance, or<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 80px;\">(c)\u00a0\u00a0 theatre,<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">Where the consideration charged for such performance\u00a0does not exceed Rs. 1,50,000. However, it is to be noted that the said exemption shall not be available in respect of service provided as a brand ambassador.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">6. \u201cArtist\u201d are categories\u00a0supported\u00a0their earnings. One who charges\u00a0but\u00a0INR 1.50 Lacs are exempted. If consideration exceeds INR 1.50 lakhs even by a rupee, then artist would lose the\u00a0advantage of\u00a0exemption.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">7. These entries are given in same exemption notification thus\u00a0the selection\u00a0of words employed\u00a0could be a\u00a0conscious one intended\u00a0to possess\u00a0different applications.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">8. As per Apex Court\u00a0just in case\u00a0of Dilip Kumar (supra), the Supreme Court reiterates the settled proposition that an Exemption Notification must be interpreted strictly. Thus, as per Entry 77, being, \u2018up to\u2019 an amount of Rs.7,500\/-, can be interpreted that where the contribution exceeds Rs. 7,500, the amount in excess would be\u00a0susceptible to\u00a0tax.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">9. The term \u2018up to\u2019 connotes an upper limit\u00a0and also the\u00a0same is interchangeable with the term \u2018till\u2019. Thus, the amount up to Rs.7,500\/- would be exempt from the application of GST.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">10. As regards the argument concerning slab rate, a slab\u00a0may be a\u00a0measure of determining\u00a0liabilities. The intendment of the exemption Entry in question\u00a0is just\u00a0to exempt contributions till\u00a0a particular\u00a0specified limit.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px;\">11. Therefore, The clarification by the GST Department when early as in 2017 has taken the right view.<\/p>\n<h3><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"FINAL_DECISION_BY_HONBLE_MADRAS_HIGH_COURT\"><\/span><span style=\"color: #000080;\"><strong>FINAL DECISION BY HON\u2019BLE MADRAS\u00a0HIGH COURT<\/strong><\/span><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n<p>Hon\u2019ble\u00a0supreme court\u00a0held that Clarification by the GST Department in 2017 was correct. The judgement\u00a0lapsed\u00a0AAR and further passed the Circular by the CBDT is\u00a0prone to\u00a0be\u00a0put aside. Therefore, no GST is applicable on contribution received up to INR 7,500 and\u00a0just in case\u00a0of contribution received in\u00a0way over\u00a0INR 7,500, GST would levy only on additional amount.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\" wp-image-3953\" src=\"https:\/\/www.caindelhiindia.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/Gst-On-Contribution-By-Residential-Welfare-Association-From-Its-Members.png\" alt=\"Gst On Contribution By Residential Welfare Association From Its Members\" width=\"979\" height=\"622\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.caindelhiindia.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/Gst-On-Contribution-By-Residential-Welfare-Association-From-Its-Members.png 803w, https:\/\/www.caindelhiindia.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/Gst-On-Contribution-By-Residential-Welfare-Association-From-Its-Members-300x191.png 300w, https:\/\/www.caindelhiindia.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/Gst-On-Contribution-By-Residential-Welfare-Association-From-Its-Members-768x488.png 768w, https:\/\/www.caindelhiindia.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/Gst-On-Contribution-By-Residential-Welfare-Association-From-Its-Members-800x508.png 800w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 979px) 100vw, 979px\" \/><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Read about the Application of GST on Contribution By RWA Members BRIEF INTRODUCTION With the introduction of GST in 2017, Entry 77 was introduced via Notification No. 12\/2017-CT dated June 28, 2017. As per the notification, exemption was granted in respect of contribution, being received by RWAs in\u00a0way over\u00a0Rs. 7,500. As per the clarifications issued &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[144],"tags":[869],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.caindelhiindia.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3950"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.caindelhiindia.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.caindelhiindia.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.caindelhiindia.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.caindelhiindia.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3950"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.caindelhiindia.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3950\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3952,"href":"https:\/\/www.caindelhiindia.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3950\/revisions\/3952"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.caindelhiindia.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3950"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.caindelhiindia.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3950"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.caindelhiindia.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3950"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}