{"id":751,"date":"2015-12-21T07:10:00","date_gmt":"2015-12-21T07:10:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/caindelhiindia.com\/blog\/?p=751"},"modified":"2023-06-25T07:01:03","modified_gmt":"2023-06-25T07:01:03","slug":"corporate-professional-update-december-21-2015","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.caindelhiindia.com\/blog\/corporate-professional-update-december-21-2015\/","title":{"rendered":"CORPORATE &#038; PROFESSIONAL UPDATE DECEMBER 21, 2015"},"content":{"rendered":"<div id=\"ez-toc-container\" class=\"ez-toc-v2_0_58 counter-hierarchy ez-toc-counter ez-toc-grey ez-toc-container-direction\">\n<p class=\"ez-toc-title\">Table of Contents<\/p>\n<label for=\"ez-toc-cssicon-toggle-item-69d3815d293e3\" class=\"ez-toc-cssicon-toggle-label\"><span class=\"\"><span class=\"eztoc-hide\" style=\"display:none;\">Toggle<\/span><span class=\"ez-toc-icon-toggle-span\"><svg style=\"fill: #999;color:#999\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" class=\"list-377408\" width=\"20px\" height=\"20px\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" fill=\"none\"><path d=\"M6 6H4v2h2V6zm14 0H8v2h12V6zM4 11h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2zM4 16h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2z\" fill=\"currentColor\"><\/path><\/svg><svg style=\"fill: #999;color:#999\" class=\"arrow-unsorted-368013\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" width=\"10px\" height=\"10px\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" version=\"1.2\" baseProfile=\"tiny\"><path d=\"M18.2 9.3l-6.2-6.3-6.2 6.3c-.2.2-.3.4-.3.7s.1.5.3.7c.2.2.4.3.7.3h11c.3 0 .5-.1.7-.3.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7zM5.8 14.7l6.2 6.3 6.2-6.3c.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7c-.2-.2-.4-.3-.7-.3h-11c-.3 0-.5.1-.7.3-.2.2-.3.5-.3.7s.1.5.3.7z\"\/><\/svg><\/span><\/span><\/label><input type=\"checkbox\"  id=\"ez-toc-cssicon-toggle-item-69d3815d293e3\"  aria-label=\"Toggle\" \/><nav><ul class='ez-toc-list ez-toc-list-level-1 ' ><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-1\" href=\"https:\/\/www.caindelhiindia.com\/blog\/corporate-professional-update-december-21-2015\/#CORPORATE_PROFESSIONAL_UPDATE_DECEMBER_21_2015\" title=\"CORPORATE &amp; PROFESSIONAL UPDATE DECEMBER 21, 2015\">CORPORATE &amp; PROFESSIONAL UPDATE DECEMBER 21, 2015<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3'><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-2\" href=\"https:\/\/www.caindelhiindia.com\/blog\/corporate-professional-update-december-21-2015\/#INCOME_TAX_ACT\" title=\"INCOME TAX ACT\">INCOME TAX ACT<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-3\" href=\"https:\/\/www.caindelhiindia.com\/blog\/corporate-professional-update-december-21-2015\/#COMPANIES_ACT\" title=\"COMPANIES ACT\">COMPANIES ACT<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-4\" href=\"https:\/\/www.caindelhiindia.com\/blog\/corporate-professional-update-december-21-2015\/#SERVICE_TAX\" title=\"SERVICE TAX\">SERVICE TAX<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-5\" href=\"https:\/\/www.caindelhiindia.com\/blog\/corporate-professional-update-december-21-2015\/#CENTRAL_EXCISE_ACT\" title=\"CENTRAL EXCISE ACT\">CENTRAL EXCISE ACT<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-6\" href=\"https:\/\/www.caindelhiindia.com\/blog\/corporate-professional-update-december-21-2015\/#CENTRAL_EXCISE_TARIFF_ACT\" title=\"CENTRAL EXCISE TARIFF ACT\">CENTRAL EXCISE TARIFF ACT<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-7\" href=\"https:\/\/www.caindelhiindia.com\/blog\/corporate-professional-update-december-21-2015\/#CUSTOMS_ACT\" title=\"CUSTOMS ACT\">CUSTOMS ACT<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-8\" href=\"https:\/\/www.caindelhiindia.com\/blog\/corporate-professional-update-december-21-2015\/#CST_VAT\" title=\"CST &amp; VAT\">CST &amp; VAT<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-9\" href=\"https:\/\/www.caindelhiindia.com\/blog\/corporate-professional-update-december-21-2015\/#STATUTES\" title=\"STATUTES\">STATUTES<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><\/ul><\/nav><\/div>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"CORPORATE_PROFESSIONAL_UPDATE_DECEMBER_21_2015\"><\/span><span style=\"color: #000080;\"><strong>CORPORATE &amp; PROFESSIONAL UPDATE DECEMBER 21, 2015<\/strong><\/span><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<figure id=\"attachment_3104\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-3104\" style=\"width: 971px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.caindelhiindia.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/corporate-update.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\" wp-image-3104\" src=\"https:\/\/www.caindelhiindia.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/corporate-update.png\" alt=\"www.caindelhiindia.com; corporate updates \" width=\"971\" height=\"353\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-3104\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">www.caindelhiindia.com; corporate updates<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<h3 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"INCOME_TAX_ACT\"><\/span><span style=\"color: #800000;\"><strong>INCOME TAX ACT<\/strong><\/span><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><strong>SECTION 28(i)<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff6600;\"><strong>BUSINESS LOSS\/DEDUCTIONS \u2013 ALLOWABLE AS<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">In the case of a contractual dispute between the parties, liability of the assessee to pay arises only when the claimant against the assessee acquires some legal right to receive the amount &#8211;\u00a0<em>[2015] 64\u00a0<\/em><em>\u00a0260 (Delhi &#8211; Trib.) (SB)<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><strong>SECTION 92C<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff6600;\"><strong>TRANSFER PRICING &#8211; COMPUTATION OF ARM&#8217;S LENGTH PRICE<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Comparables and adjustments\/Adjustments &#8211; AMP expenses :\u00a0<\/strong>Approach to be adopted in case of manufacturer and a distributor for working out expenditure on AMP is different, hence, assessee being full-fledged manufacturer guidelines as culled out by High Court in case of &#8216;Sony Ericsson&#8217; Mobile Communications India (P.) Ltd. v. CIT [2015] 374 ITR 118\/231 \u00a0(Delhi) were to be followed &#8211;<em>[2015] 64\u00a0<\/em><em>\u00a084 (Chandigarh \u2013 Trib.)<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><strong>SECTION 132B<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff6600;\"><strong>SEARCH AND SEIZURE &#8211; RETAINED ASSETS, APPLICATION OF<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Appropriation towards tax :\u00a0<\/strong>In absence of any return filed and assessment made or any determinative process undertaken, question of ITO specifying a liability arising out of search proceeding would not arise &#8211;\u00a0<em>[2015] 64<\/em><em>\u00a0108 (Delhi)<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><strong>SECTION 147<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff6600;\"><strong>INCOME ESCAPING ASSESSMENT &#8211; GENERAL<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Audit objection :\u00a0<\/strong>Where Assessing Officer had considered issue relating to taxability of interest in detail at time of assessment, action of reopening solely at behest of audit party without any independent belief while recording reasons would surely make reassessment vulnerable &#8211;\u00a0<em>[2015] 63\u00a0<\/em><em>\u00a0342 (Gujarat)<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><strong>SECTION 220<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff6600;\"><strong>COLLECTION AND RECOVERY OF TAX &#8211; WHEN TAX PAYABLE AND WHEN ASSESSEE DEEMED IN DEFAULT<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Stay of demand :\u00a0<\/strong>If demand in dispute related to issues that had been decided in another assessee&#8217;sfavour on similar facts by an appellate authority or Court earlier, demand will be stayed &#8211;\u00a0<em>[2015] 64\u00a0<\/em><em>\u00a086 (Madras)<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><strong>SECTION 254<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff6600;\"><strong>APPELLATE TRIBUNAL &#8211; POWERS OF<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Power to grant Stay :\u00a0<\/strong>Tribunal has power to extend stay beyond period of 365 days as stipulated in section 254(2A) provided delay in disposal of appeal is not attributable to assessee &#8211;\u00a0<em>[2015] 64\u00a0<\/em><em>\u00a0111 (Delhi &#8211; Trib.)<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><strong>SECTION 293<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff6600;\"><strong>BAR OF SUITS IN CIVIL COURT<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Search and seizure :\u00a0<\/strong>Income-tax Act is a complete code and no separate suit is maintainable against finding of fact in such proceeding &#8211;\u00a0<em>[2015] 64\u00a0<\/em><em>\u00a066 (Punjab &amp; Haryana)<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Applicability of :\u00a0<\/strong>Where dues of assessee towards department stood determined by Settlement Commission, in such a case, assessee had a right to claim interest on amount deposited with department in proceedings under section 245D(6) and High Court had no jurisdiction to entertain civil suit filed in that regard in view of specific bar contained in section 293 &#8211;\u00a0<em>[2015] 64\u00a0<\/em><em>\u00a087 (Delhi)<\/em><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\"><span style=\"color: #ff6600; text-decoration: underline;\"><strong>TDS credit<\/strong> <\/span><\/span>&#8211; Vendor deposited the TDS with the PAN of the assessee wrongly instead of its sister concern &#8211; Assessee did not offer any income corresponding to TDS &#8211; credit allowed &#8211; <strong>HC \u2013\u00a0(Commissioner of Income Tax-15 Versus M\/s Relcom, DELHI HIGH COURT).<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #ff6600; text-decoration: underline;\">Commission for issuing the DDs and POs<\/span><\/strong><\/span> &#8211; CIT deleted the additions made in the hands of the Assessee only on the ground that in Ravinder Yadav s hand they have already been taxed &#8211; Revenue has not merit in the case appeal dismissed-<strong>\u00a0(PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-6 Versus M\/s NORTHERN STRIPS LTD., DELHI HIGH COURT).<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ul style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"text-decoration: underline; color: #ff6600;\"><strong>Addition u\/s 68<\/strong> <\/span>&#8211; No addition can be made in the hands of the Assessee under Section 68 of the Act and it will be open to the Revenue to move against the share applicants in accordance with law-\u00a0<strong>(COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-9 ERSTWHILE CIT-VI Versus VRINDAVAN FARMS (P) LTD., DELHI HIGH COURT).<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\"><span style=\"color: #ff6600; text-decoration: underline;\"><strong>Addition made u\/s 14A r.w. 115JB &#8211; MAT computation<\/strong> <\/span><\/span>&#8211; AO has rightly disallowed the expenditure of Rs. 7307018\/- by invoking the provisions of Section 14A read with Rule 8D of Income Tax Rules 1962 for computing book profit u\/s 115JB(2) read with clause (f) to explanation 1 to clause 115JB(2)\u2013<strong>(DCIT, Central Circle-18 &amp; 19, Mumbai Versus Viraj Profiles Limited., ITAT MUMBAI)<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"COMPANIES_ACT\"><\/span><span style=\"color: #800000;\"><strong>COMPANIES ACT<\/strong><\/span><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><strong>SECTION 433<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff6600;\"><strong>WINDING UP &#8211; CIRCUMSTANCES IN WHICH A COMPANY MAY BE WOUND UP<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Winding-up plea dismissed as overdue sum could be set-off against sum receivable from group concern of debtor company &#8211;\u00a0<em>[2015] 64\u00a0<\/em><em>\u00a0140 (Calcutta)<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Version of Form 3 LLP is likely to be modified w.e.f\u00a024th November 2015\u00a0between\u00a009:00PM to 10:00 PM. Stakeholders are requested to plan accordingly.<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"SERVICE_TAX\"><\/span><span style=\"color: #800000;\"><strong>SERVICE TAX<\/strong><\/span><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><strong>SECTION 65B(44)<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff6600;\"><strong>SERVICE &#8211; EXCLUSION OF SERVICES PROVIDED BY AN EMPLOYEE TO EMPLOYER<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Where employee of foreign holding is deputed to Indian subsidiary for a particular period and during that period, employee was treated as &#8217;employee&#8217; of Indian subsidiary, salary paid to such employee by Indian subsidiary cannot be charged to service tax in view of employer-employee relationship under section 65B(44)(b) &#8211;\u00a0<em>[2015] 64<\/em><em>\u00a0259 (AAR &#8211; New Delhi)<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><strong>SECTION 93<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff6600;\"><strong>EXEMPTIONS &#8211; SERVICE TAX &#8211; REFUND OF TAX PAID ON SERVICES USED FOR EXPORT GOODS<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">A refund claim of service tax filed beyond time-limit specified in concerned exemption notification is time-barred and not maintainable, even if same is within time-limit specified in section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 &#8211;<em>[2015] 64\u00a0<\/em><em>\u00a010 (New Delhi \u2013 CESTAT)<\/em><\/p>\n<h3 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"CENTRAL_EXCISE_ACT\"><\/span><span style=\"color: #800000;\"><strong>CENTRAL EXCISE ACT<\/strong><\/span><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #00ccff;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">SECTION 4<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff6600;\"><strong>VALUATION UNDER CENTRAL EXCISE<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Cost of Pre-delivery inspection (PDI) and free after-sales service (ASS) borne by dealers from their margin would not be included in assessable value of manufacturer for purposes of paying excise duty. In other words &#8211;\u00a0<em>[2015] 64\u00a0<\/em><em>\u00a0261 (SC)<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><strong>SECTION 35C<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff6600;\"><strong>APPEALS &#8211; ORDERS OF &#8211; APPELLATE TRIBUNAL<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Where Tribunal had merely remanded matter, there was no need for Supreme Court to interfere; however, scope of remand was extended to entire period covered by notice &#8211;\u00a0<em>[2015] 64\u00a0<\/em><em>\u00a079 (SC)<\/em><\/p>\n<h3 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"CENTRAL_EXCISE_TARIFF_ACT\"><\/span><span style=\"color: #800000;\"><strong>CENTRAL EXCISE TARIFF ACT<\/strong><\/span><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><strong>SECTION 2<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff6600;\"><strong>CLASSIFICATION &#8211; FROZEN FISH<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Mere addition of salt, Vitamin C, etc. to &#8216;fish&#8217; for chilling\/freezing purposes would not make it &#8216;cooked food or food preparation&#8217;; same would continue to be &#8216;frozen fish&#8217; and not liable to duty &#8211;\u00a0<em>[2015] 64\u00a0<\/em><em>\u00a0119 (SC)<\/em><\/p>\n<h3 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"CUSTOMS_ACT\"><\/span><span style=\"color: #800000;\"><strong>CUSTOMS ACT<\/strong><\/span><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><strong>SECTION 72<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff6600;\"><strong>WAREHOUSING UNDER CUSTOMS &#8211; GOODS IMPROPERLY REMOVED\/DEEMED REMOVALS<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Goods lying in warehouse beyond permitted period are dutiable as per section 72 based on rate of duty prevalent on date of expiry of warehousing period; judgment in Kesoram Rayon v. Collector of Customs 1996\u00a0254 (SC) is correctly decided and does not require reference to larger Bench &#8211;\u00a0<em>[2015] 64<\/em><em>\u00a080 (SC)<\/em><\/p>\n<h3 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"CST_VAT\"><\/span><span style=\"color: #800000;\"><strong>CST &amp; VAT<\/strong><\/span><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><strong>SECTION 9 OF HARYANA GENERAL SALES-TAX ACT, 1973<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff6600;\"><strong>PURCHASE TAX &#8211; LIABILITY TO<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Where assessee, a manufacturer, was granted tax benefit under rule 28B of Haryana General Sale Tax Rules and it claimed adjustment of purchase tax against notional tax liability, lower authorities were justified in disallowing claim of assessee and amount of purchase tax levied upon it was recoverable &#8211;\u00a0<em>[2015] 64<\/em><em>\u00a083 (Punjab &amp; Haryana)<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><strong>SECTION 24 OF HARYANA GENERAL SALES-TAX ACT, 1973<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff6600;\"><strong>DECLARATION FORM &#8211; FILING OF<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Assessee is entitled to produce STD-IV declaration and ST-14B Forms even before Appellate Authoritys<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><strong>SECTION 44 OF GUJARAT VALUE ADDED TAX ACT, 2003<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff6600;\"><strong>RETURNS, ASSESSMENT AND TAX ADMINISTRATION &#8211; RECOVERY &#8211; SPECIAL MODE OF<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Where against orders of assessment, assessee filed appeals together with stay applications and in meanwhile Assessing Authority issued on assessee a notice of demand and on same day he passed an order under section 44 attaching bank accounts of assessee, conduct of Assessing Authority in attaching bank accounts was not warranted, when appeals together with stay applications were pending consideration before First Appellate Authority &#8211;\u00a0<em>[2015] 64\u00a0<\/em><em>\u00a0104 (Gujarat)<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #800000;\"><strong>EXPORT OF SERVICES RULES, 2005<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">RULE 3<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff6600;\"><strong>EXPORT \u2013 SERVICES<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Commission received by assessee from foreign entity for transfer of money from abroad to beneficiaries in India, amounts to &#8220;export of service&#8221; and is, therefore, not liable to service tax &#8211;\u00a0<em>[2015] 64\u00a0<\/em><em>\u00a098 (Mumbai \u2013 CESTAT)<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #008080;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #800080;\"> <span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\"><span style=\"color: #800080; text-decoration: underline;\">INDIR<\/span><span style=\"color: #800080; text-decoration: underline;\">ECT TAXES:<\/span><\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<ul style=\"text-align: justify;\">\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"text-decoration: underline; color: #ff6600;\"><strong>Works contract service<\/strong><\/span> &#8211; Composition Scheme being optional having opted for it appellant has no locus standi to revert back to work\u00a0out the gross value charged for the services rendered-\u00a0<strong>(Sunraj Construction Versus Commissioner of Central Excise &amp; Customs, Mumbai,\u00a0CESTAT MUMBAI).<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #ff6600; text-decoration: underline;\">Denial of a refund of<\/span><span style=\"color: #ff6600; text-decoration: underline;\"> the interest recovered by the revenue<\/span><\/strong><\/span> &#8211; demand of interest is not sustainable. Consequently the interest recovered from the appellant is to be refunded. &#8211; no show cause notice has been issued to the appellant. Therefore adjustment of demand of interest is not permissible-<strong>\u00a0(M\/s Goyal Tobacco Co. Pvt. Ltd. Versus C.C.E. &amp; S.T. Jaipur-I,\u00a0CESTAT NEW DELHI).<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #ff6600; text-decoration: underline;\">Denial of CENVAT<\/span><span style=\"color: #ff6600; text-decoration: underline;\"> Credi<\/span><span style=\"color: #ff6600; text-decoration: underline;\">t &#8211; Invalid documents <\/span><\/strong><\/span>&#8211; covering letter vide which monthly returns were filed with the authorities indicated copies of RG23A part I and II as enclosures &#8211; the invocation of the extended period for demanding the Cenvat credit as being suppressed is incorrect-\u00a0<strong>(M\/s Gupta Soaps Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai-I,\u00a0CESTAT MUMBAI).<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #ff6600; text-decoration: underline;\">Refund due of revis<\/span><span style=\"color: #ff6600; text-decoration: underline;\">ion in price escalation clause<\/span><\/strong><\/span> &#8211; Refund claim was filed within one year from the issuance of credit notes &#8211; refund allowed-\u00a0<strong>(CCE, Aurangabad Versus Good year South Asia Tyres Pvt. Ltd. And Vice-Versa,\u00a0CESTAT MUMBAI).<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #800080;\">3. IC<\/span><span style=\"text-decoration: underline; color: #008080;\"><span style=\"color: #800080; text-decoration: underline;\">AI Members\/Firms to furnish PAN det<\/span><span style=\"color: #800080; text-decoration: underline;\">ails:<\/span><\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Decision taken by council following advice received from Income Tax Department. Members required to deposit self attested copy of PAN CARD to concerned regional office on or before 15 December 2015.<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"STATUTES\"><\/span><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"><strong>STATUTES<\/strong><\/span><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff6600;\"><strong>DIRECT TAX LAWS<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 \u2013 High Court \u2013 Appeal to \u2013 Adoption of Collegium system to consider withdrawal of appeals before High Courts where same are no longer considered prosecutable-<em>OFFICE MEMORANDUM [F.NO.279\/MISC.\/52\/2014-(ITJ)], DATED 10-12-2015<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff6600;\"><strong>CORPORATE LAWS<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Testing of software used in or relat<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">ed to Trading and Risk Management &#8211;\u00a0<em>CIRCULAR NO. CDMRD\/DEICE\/03\/2015, DATED 11-12-2015<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Exim Bank&#8217;s GOI supported line of Credit of USD 268.35 Million to Government of United Republic of Tanzania &#8211;<em>A.P. (DIR SERIES 2015-16) CIRCULAR NO.33, DATED 10-12-2015<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Exim Bank&#8217;s GOI supported line of Credit of USD 55 Million to Government of Republic of Congo &#8211;\u00a0<em>A.P. (DIR SERIES 2015-16) CIRCULAR NO.34, DATED 10-12-2015<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Inclusion of IDFC Bank Ltd in Second Schedule to Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 &#8211;\u00a0<em>CIRCULAR DBR.NO.RET.BC.66\/12.07.136A\/2015-16, DATED 10-12-2015<\/em><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #800080;\"><strong>4. <span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\"><span style=\"color: #800080; text-decoration: underline;\">FAQ ON CO<\/span><span style=\"color: #800080; text-decoration: underline;\">MPANY LAW:<\/span><\/span>\u00a0<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<table style=\"height: 629px;\" width=\"1004\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"326\">\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #ff6600;\">Query<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"326\">\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #ff6600;\">Answer<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: justify;\" width=\"326\">If any Private Limited Company has taken unsecured loan from its director and their relatives during 2014-15 then how this will be reported in Audit report, Director report and notes to accounts.<\/td>\n<td style=\"text-align: justify;\" width=\"326\">As per Companies Act 2013, Companies are allowed to take loan from directors but are not allowed to take loan from the relatives of directors, during the F.Y 2014-15. Therefore, loan taken by Companies from the relatives of director(s) is required to be qualified by the Auditor in his Auditor&#8217;s Report and the Board is required to answer the qualified opinion of Auditor in Director&#8217;s Report or Board Report.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"text-align: justify;\" width=\"326\">I got appointed as statutory auditor in a Private Limited Company on 25th August 2015. Previous auditor has given NOC but till now I have not filed Form ADT-1 and other ROC filing due to confusion in filing Form ADT-1. Like whether I have to attach Form ADT-3 also or not, whether I have to file 2 Form ADT-1 i.e. For the period upto this 30th Sept (date of AGM) and next for 5 years i.e. upto 30th Sept 2020. Please advise me.<\/td>\n<td width=\"326\">\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Previous Auditor of the Company is required to file Form ADT-3 attaching the copy of his Resignation letter addressed to the Company. And you are required to file Form ADT-1 regarding your appointment as Statutory Auditor of Company from the date of appointment for next five financial years (including current financial year).<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\"><span style=\"color: #800080; text-decoration: underline;\"><strong><span style=\"color: #ff6600; text-decoration: underline;\">Government may bring cha<\/span><span style=\"color: #ff6600; text-decoration: underline;\">nge in rate of corporate tax:<\/span><\/strong><\/span><\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">It has been known from the sources that Govt. may bring corporate tax rate down from 30% to 25%.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"color: #ff6600;\"><strong>INDIRECT TAX LAWS (ST.\/EX.\/CUS. &amp; (CST &amp; VAT)<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Applicability of Service tax on services received by apparel exporters in relation to fabrication of garments &#8211;<em>CIRCULAR NO.190\/9\/2015-ST, DATED 15-12-2015<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Extension for filing of Reconciliation return for Year 2014-15 &#8211;\u00a0<em>CIRCULAR NO.32 OF 2015-16 [NO.F.3(589)\/POLICY\/VAT\/2015\/1162-68, DATED 15-12-2015<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances; Hope the information will assist you in your Professional\u00a0endeavors. For query or help, contact:\u00a0<a href=\"mailto:info@carajput.com\">info@caindelhiindia.com<\/a>\u00a0or call at\u00a0011-233 433 33.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>CORPORATE &amp; PROFESSIONAL UPDATE DECEMBER 21, 2015 INCOME TAX ACT SECTION 28(i) BUSINESS LOSS\/DEDUCTIONS \u2013 ALLOWABLE AS In the case of a contractual dispute between the parties, liability of the assessee to pay arises only when the claimant against the assessee acquires some legal right to receive the amount &#8211;\u00a0[2015] 64\u00a0\u00a0260 (Delhi &#8211; Trib.) (SB) &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[144],"tags":[835],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.caindelhiindia.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/751"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.caindelhiindia.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.caindelhiindia.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.caindelhiindia.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.caindelhiindia.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=751"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/www.caindelhiindia.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/751\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5919,"href":"https:\/\/www.caindelhiindia.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/751\/revisions\/5919"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.caindelhiindia.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=751"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.caindelhiindia.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=751"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.caindelhiindia.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=751"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}