IEC in DEL List Compliance Consequence; Corrective Mechanism
Table of Contents
IEC in the Denied Entity List (DEL): Compliance, Consequences, and Corrective Mechanisms under India’s Foreign Trade Policy
Introduction
The smooth functioning of India’s international trade ecosystem depends on adherence to regulatory obligations under the Foreign Trade Policy, Customs Act, and Directorate General of Foreign. Under this blog mentioned the Guidelines for maintaining the Denied Entities List (DEL) issued by the Directorate General of Foreign Trade (DGFT), Ministry of Commerce & Industry.
An Importer Exporter Code placed on the Directorate General of Foreign Trade’s; Denied Entity List (DEL) indicates a suspension of trade privileges due to non-compliance under the Foreign Trade Policy (FTP), Customs Act, or allied laws. Common causes include non-fulfilment of export obligations, misuse of export incentives, non-submission of mandatory documents, or pending adjudications.
The listing restricts access to Directorate General of Foreign Trade’s Authorisations, may trigger shipment blocks, banking restrictions, and penalties, and can even result in Importer Exporter Code suspension or cancellation. This case exporter removal requires rectification of defaults, submission of evidence to the Directorate General of Foreign Trade’s regional authority, and successful verification. Proactive compliance, digital recordkeeping, and internal monitoring remain the most effective tools for avoiding DEL inclusion. Here’s a concise summary of the key points:
TRADE’S PROCEDURES- IEC IN THE DENIED ENTITY LIST (DEL)
- To enforce compliance, the Directorate General of Foreign Trade’s maintains a Denied Entity List a database of Importer Exporter Code holders temporarily or permanently restricted from trade-related privileges due to violations or unfulfilled obligations.
- The Importer Exporter Code, a unique Ten-digit registration number issued by Directorate General of Foreign Trade’s, is central to all export–import activities. Placement of an Importer Exporter Code in the DEL implies suspension of trade operations until compliance is restored.
What is an Importer Exporter Code ?
| Particular | Description |
| Issuing Authority | Directorate General of Foreign Trade. |
| Legal Basis | Sections under the Foreign Trade (Development & Regulation) Act, 1992 and Foreign Trade (Regulation) Rules, 1993 |
| Nature | 10 Digit lifetime registration number used for all import/export transactions |
| Purpose | Enables tracking of trade activities, claiming of Foreign Trade Policy incentives, and ensuring regulatory oversight |
| Mandatory Requirement | No person can import or export without an Importer Exporter Code unless specifically exempt (e.g., for personal use or government departments) |
What is the Denied Entity List?
The Denied Entity List is maintained by the Directorate General of Foreign Trade to identify IEC holders barred from availing DGFT services, authorisations, or incentives due to regulatory defaults. Purpose of DEL is The DEL (formerly called “Black List”) is maintained under Rule 7 of the Foreign Trade (Regulation) Rules, 1993. It lists entities that can be denied licenses for export/import under certain conditions. Denied Entity List Key Features:
- Restricts access to new authorisations, licenses, or Foreign Trade Policy benefits until issues are resolved.
- Dynamic listing entities are added or removed based on compliance status.
- Functions as a temporary enforcement mechanism, not a permanent blacklisting.
- Key Conditions for Denial
- Default in Export Obligation (EO) under export promotion schemes.
- Recommendations from external agencies (DRI, CBI, ED) for withholding licensing facilities.
- Fraud, forgery, or mis-declaration in obtaining licenses (Rule 7(1)(c)).
- Other violations under the Foreign Trade (Development & Regulation) Act, 1992.
Common Reasons for Denied Entity List Inclusion
- Default in Export Obligations : Non-fulfilment under EPCG, Advance Authorisation, or DFIA schemes.
- Non-submission of Mandatory Documents : Failure to submit EODC, installation certificates, or periodic reports.
- Violation of FTP or Customs Laws : Misdeclaration, over-invoicing, or misuse of export incentives.
- Non-payment of Duties or Penalties : Outstanding dues under Customs or DGFT adjudications.
- Importer Exporter Code Non-updation or Linking Issues : Failure to update or link Importer Exporter Code annually with PAN, as per the Directorate General of Foreign Trade’s Notification No. 58/2015-20 (12.02.2021).
- Pending Investigations or Adjudications : Ongoing inquiries under DGFT, Customs, or DRI.
Procedures for Denied Entity List Inclusion
- Demand Notice: Issued before placing a firm in DEL for EO default.
- Speaking Order: Required for denial, suspension, or cancellation of licenses.
- Right to be Heard: Entities must be given an opportunity before any adverse order.
- Suspension/Cancellation: Governed by Section 9 of the Act and Rules 9 & 10.
- DEL Management : DEL must include Firm details (name, address, IEC number).Names and addresses of partners/directors. Licensing benefits denied to both entities and individuals controlling them, Centralized computerized database to be maintained, Removal from DEL also requires a speaking order.
Consequences of Being on the Denied Entity List
| Area | Impact |
| DGFT Services | Suspension of new authorisations, scrips, or licenses (EPCG, Advance Authorisation, MEIS/SEIS). |
| Customs Operations | Import/export shipments may be blocked or subjected to 100% examination. |
| Banking (AD Code) | Banks may flag Importer Exporter Code’s, halt export incentives, or delay forex remittances. |
| Reputation | Erosion of credibility among trade partners and buyers. |
| Legal Risk | Exposure to penalties, prosecution, and possible Importer Exporter Code cancellation U/s 11(2) of the FT (D&R) Act, 1992. |
Penal Actions by DGFT :
U/s 11(2) of the Foreign Trade (Development & Regulation) Act, 1992, the Directorate General of Foreign Trade or its Regional Authorities may initiate:
- Suspension or cancellation of Importer Exporter Code
- Fiscal penalty or recovery of duties/interest
- Debarment from new authorisations
- Prosecution in cases of misrepresentation or fraud
Note: Due process applies the Directorate General of Foreign Trade’s issues a Show Cause Notice before taking any penal action.
Removal from the Denied Entity List—Steps for Restoration:
- Identify the Cause: Check the Directorate General of Foreign Trade’s portal or communication for reasons of listing.
- Rectify the Default: Fulfil export obligations, pay dues, submit EODC, or update IEC details.
- Submit Representation: File a formal request with supporting documents to the concerned DGFT Regional Authority.
- Verification & Approval: DGFT examines and approves removal upon verification.
- Status Update: Once approved, the Importer Exporter Code status changes from “Denied Entity” to “Active” in the Directorate General of Foreign Trade records.
Compliance Management: Avoiding Denied Entity List Inclusion
- FTP & the Directorate General of Foreign Trade’s Compliance
- Track export obligations and EODC submissions.
- File annual Importer Exporter Code updates and maintain records for at least 5 years (Rule 7, FTR Rules 1993).
- Customs Compliance
-
- Ensure accurate classification, valuation, and declaration.
- Avoid over-invoicing and ensure timely payment of duties.
- Financial Compliance
-
- Realise export proceeds within 9 months (as per RBI norms).
- Maintain valid linkage of IEC with AD Code and PAN.
- Governance & Controls
-
- Implement compliance audit trails and internal reviews.
- Adopt ERP-based monitoring of the Directorate General of Foreign Trade obligations.
Good Trade Practices under Foreign Trade Policy and Customs Laws
| Area | Recommended Practice |
| Documentation | Maintain Shipping Bills, BoE, Invoices, BL/AWB, and EODC records accurately. |
| Timely Reporting | Meet due dates for EODC, returns, and the Directorate General of Foreign Trade’s T replies. |
| Transparency | Declare correct product details and invoice values. |
| Ethics | Avoid fraudulent or inflated incentive claims. |
| Training | Conduct periodic staff training on Foreign Trade Policy amendments. |
| Digital Compliance | Use DGFT and ICEGATE portals for e-filing and monitoring. |
Way Forward and Conclusion
The DEL is not a punitive blacklist it’s a regulatory safeguard promoting accountability in trade. However, recurring defaults point to weak compliance systems within organisations. Way Forward:
- DGFT is expected to integrate AI-based risk profiling and predictive analytics for early detection of non-compliance.
- Businesses should enhance digital compliance frameworks and inter-departmental coordination between the Directorate General of Foreign Trade, Customs, GST, and RBI.
- Maintaining an Active Importer Exporter Code status reflects both regulatory discipline and trade integrity.
Conclusion:
Sustained compliance with Foreign Trade Policy, Customs, and the Directorate General of Foreign Trade’s requirements, supported by robust documentation, ethical conduct, and timely filings is essential for ensuring uninterrupted participation in India’s international trade network.
References
- Foreign Trade (Development & Regulation) Act, 1992
- Foreign Trade (Regulation) Rules, 1993
- DGFT Handbook of Procedures, Vol. I, Paras 2.05 & 2.58 (2023)
- DGFT Notification No. 58/2015–20 (12.02.2021): Annual IEC Update Requirement
- CBIC Circulars on Export Obligation and EODC procedures
- RBI Master Direction on Export of Goods and Services (2023)
- DGFT Public and Trade Notices (2015–2025)
**********************************************************
If this article has helped you in any way, i would appreciate if you could share/like it or leave a comment. Thank you for visiting my blog.
Legal Disclaimer:
The information / articles & any relies to the comments on this blog are provided purely for informational and educational purposes only & are purely based on my understanding / knowledge. They do noy constitute legal advice or legal opinions. The information / articles and any replies to the comments are intended but not promised or guaranteed to be current, complete, or up-to-date and should in no way be taken as a legal advice or an indication of future results. Therefore, i can not take any responsibility for the results or consequences of any attempt to use or adopt any of the information presented on this blog. You are advised not to act or rely on any information / articles contained without first seeking the advice of a practicing professional.
