Penalty on Harassment by GST Officer in Grant Registration
Table of Contents
Penalty on Harassment by GST Officer in granting GST Registration
- GST department was fined by the Allahabad high court for harassing people by copying their electricity bills in order to obtain GST enrollment. The petitioner Ranjana Singh is engaged in the business of providing employment through consulting, which falls under the ambit of the UP. GST Act. The application has been submitted to GST registration facilitate under the GST Act via the internet.
- Following the submission of the application, an examination of the applicant’s business premises will be conducted, and a notice will be issued to give particular details and supporting documentation. The applicant’s application was denied after responding to a submission through the impugned order, and the applicant chose to appeal to the respondent, which was likewise denied.
Popular Article :
CBDT issue an explanation in Vivad se Vishwas act,2020
Reduction in compliance of obligation under Atmanirbhar Scheme
- The applicant applied for GST enrollment under section 25 of the Act, read with rules 8 and 9 of the Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017, and provided all of the required papers, including an Aadhaar card, a PAN card, and a house tax receipt.
- As a consequence, on the inspection day, all necessary information was provided via serving officer. The applicant was given notice that he or she needed to submit electricity bills, house tax bills, or any other documentation related to the business. Against the answer, the applicant provided the information and documents required, but the challenged order was not refused to accept due to the non-submission of an electricity bill.
- Justice Piyush Agarwal believes that the applicant provided all of the documentation required by the act and the legislation, as well as compliance with the show cause notice, and that the application should not be denied without pointing out any errors or flaws.
- Honorable High court stated that the two state officials were just looking to harass the petitioner, which would not be tolerated at any cost. The respondents in this case have the same mindset as the respondents in the previous case, as officers who come in as state officials must perform properly and in line with the terms of the act and the rules.
- “The writ petition is allowed with a cost of Rs. 15,000/-, which must be deposited with the Allahabad High Court State Legal Services Committee within 20 days after today.” The respondents are free to seek reimbursement from the erring Officer.”
Conclusion
- Unnecessary harassments by the GST Officer for the copy of electricity bill for granting GST Registration, penalty imposed 15000/- for officer by the Allahabad HC.
- The writ petition is allowed with cost of Rs. 15,000/-, which shall be deposited before the High Court State Legal Services Committee, Allahabad within a period of 20 days from today.
- Basic Respondents are at liberty to recover the cost from the erring GST Officer.
Are you eligible for e-Invoice?
- E-invoicing has been mandated by the Indian government for businesses with yearly revenues over $20 million.
- Presently, the e-Invoice format is complicated, having over 87 fields. As a result, it will be difficult to generate a significant quantity of E-Invoices.
- Replace your manual and time-consuming e-Invoice generating with a more inventive and automatic e-Invoicing solution to enable hassle-free mass e-Invoice generation and long-term tracking of your IRNs.
Popular Blogs :
- Monitoring of high-value Transaction by Department
- CBDT-Tax deptt. hopes to finalize all faceless e-assessment
**********************************************************
If this article has helped you in any way, i would appreciate if you could share/like it or leave a comment. Thank you for visiting my blog.
Legal Disclaimer:
The information / articles & any relies to the comments on this blog are provided purely for informational and educational purposes only & are purely based on my understanding / knowledge. They do noy constitute legal advice or legal opinions. The information / articles and any replies to the comments are intended but not promised or guaranteed to be current, complete, or up-to-date and should in no way be taken as a legal advice or an indication of future results. Therefore, i can not take any responsibility for the results or consequences of any attempt to use or adopt any of the information presented on this blog. You are advised not to act or rely on any information / articles contained without first seeking the advice of a practicing professional.