Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process Introduction
Table of Contents
Introduction of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process
India has passed the IBC Code in 2016. The significant changes and improvements which were termed the largest economic reform were done by the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). Now it becomes a Rules & Regulation that will speed up India’s insolvency procedure.
The main objective of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code is to amend & amalgamate the laws concerning individuals, partnership firms and insolvency of corporate persons etc. Proceedings against the debtors can be done Via Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process and can be started by :-
- Corporate persons
- Operational creditors;
- Financial creditors;
NCLT is the jurisdictional body, it is a forum where CIRP proceedings can be initiated, and appeals against its decision can be taken to the NCLAT. Debt Recovery Tribunal is the function of NCLT under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code.
Introduction:
The main aim of IBC code 2016 was amending and synthesizing the rules and regulations relating to reorganizing and partnership firms, individuals, and insolvency resolution of corporate persons in a time specified manner in order to increase the value of such foster entrepreneurship and persons assets & increase availability while balancing the benefit of all stakeholders including creditor.
According to part II of the IBC set the liquidation and insolvency is the process for all corporate debtors. Which has a deadline of 180 days which can be increased by another 90 days and more to finish the process.
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code involves establishment of new forum to adjudicate insolvency proceedings, the establishment of dedicated regulator, the creation of a new category of insolvency professionals, & the creation of new category of information utility providers as the novel features in terms of corporate insolvency. The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, was written in such a way that corporations do not have to go bankrupt. If no resolution/ settlement is made, the company will be liquidated.
In the matter of M/s Innoventive Industries Ltd. vs. ICICI Bank[1], the Apex Court noted key highlighted for the first time how the recently enacted IBC Code of 2016, which consolidates and alters all legislation relating to insolvency and bankruptcy processes, has resulted in a fundamental change in the law.
Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process:
- CIRP means Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process. It is a method of recovery from Corporate Debtors. Even if the default is wilful, In case if the corporate debtor has the means to pay but chooses not to pay CIRP can be started. Hence, the focal point of IBC is the default of payment obligation.
- The CIRP can be initiated against the corporation, if that corporation becomes insolvent. In each category, thee is a code set as default value and govt will declare final amount as the potential trigger for the process to begin, keeping in mind the economy’s fluctuation. It is also important to note that the stated amount is a range not maximum and a minimum set of debt default.
Initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process can be done by:
Financial Creditor:
- If a person is owing to a business obligation or convyed to that person or such an amount is legally allocated. Type of financial entities are banks and other financial institution.
Operational Creditor:
- Anyone who owes them an operational obligation, as well as anyone who has properly delegated or transferred that sum in exchange for products or services they have provided. Consider vendors and staff.
Corporate Applicant:
- Any person who is a corporate debtor or a corporate debtors member or partner who is bound to file an application or an individual who is in order of the corporate debtors activites and resources or a person who has control and oversight over the corporate debtors financial activities.
Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process:
- Once the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process gets commenced under section 7 or 8 and 9 or 10 of the IBC 2016, the Adjudicating Authority will become liable to take additional action ( NCLT).
- Section 12(1)(2) of the stipulates that the CIRP must be completed within 180 days of NCLT’s application to begin the procedure. However, if the resolution professional files an application with the Adjudicating Authority, the time frame might be extended and the process started.
- if the Committee of Creditors is ordered by a resolution passed by a vote of 66 percent of the voting shares at a meeting. Following receipt of such approval, a resolution professional will submit an application to the adjudicating authority.
- Adjudicating Authority can only grant one extension up to 90 days after receiving such an application.
- CIRP must be completed within 330 days of the insolvency beginning date, including any extensions granted by the Code[6] and time spent in court proceedings linked to the corporate debtor’s resolution process.
Application to NCLT:
- When a company fails to fulfil payments, the affected creditors can file a CIRP petition with the Adjudicating Authority, which is the NCLT. In circumstances where the firm is the corporate debtor, it is deemed a competent authority for adjudication.
- The merits of the petition are evaluated, and it is established whether the petition has locus standi before the NCLT once it is presented. If the merits of the case are not satisfied, the NCLT may reject the petition.
Application for Interim Resolution Process:
- Committee of Creditors (CoC) nominates and appoints a resolution professional so that the Tribunal appoints the Interim insolvency professional for the time being. In the second stage of the process, the Interim insolvency professional must decide whether to complete the rest of the insolvency procedure or ensure that the corporate debtor’s activities are in the public interest.
Moratorium:
- Moratorium phase started after the Tribunal approves the petition. After the moratorium is declared, financial creditors are unable to obtain any funds from the corporate debtor’s account.
The Tribunal is prohibited while this is declared:
- Filing of new litigation or the continuing of current lawsuits (in relation to financial debt) against the corporate debtor.
- Corporate debtor is relieved of all operational, financial, legal, and management obligations;
- Any subsequent foreclosure or debt collection action brought against the corporate debtor pursuant to the SARFAESI Act of 2002;[13] and
- Under the SARFAESI Act of 2002, any property owned by the corporate debtor.
CIRP procedure will be completed before the moratorium is lifted. This term can run up to 180 days, with a 90-day extension possible in unusual situations.
Collation and analysis of facts:
- The Interim insolvency professional is in charge of identifying and examining the petitioner’s claims. If Interim insolvency professional requests an explanation of the petitioner’s claim, the Code allows Interim insolvency professional to meet with the petitioner to obtain any clarification needed.
- Interim insolvency professional must appoint a Committee of Creditors within 30 days of the CIRP’s start date (CoC). After the CoC is established, the Committee appoints a Resolution professional (RP). The CoC must decide whether to appoint a temporary RP as a resolution professional or to select another RP to replace the interim resolution professional within seven days of the Committee’s creation.
Verification and Analysis of Claims:
- Creditor claims will be summoned, verified, and classified by Interim insolvency professional’s. After 30 days after being admitted into CIRP, a CoC will be formed, which will include all of the corporate debtor’s financial creditors.
Resolution Plan:
- Following the Interim insolvency professional/collation insolvency professional’s and verification of the petitioner’s statements, the CoC must publish a public statement. The notice of bankruptcy specifies that the corporate debtor is facing insolvency proceedings and that all interested candidates or bidders are invited to submit a resolution plan for consideration. Among the bidders could be potential investors, creditors, and others. The CoC evaluates proposed resolution plans based on the amount of recommendations received. The proposal that receives more than 75% of the CoC’s approval will be automatically submitted to the NCLT.
Decision:
- The CoC will adopt a resolution plan, which will subsequently be presented to the NCLT. If the NCLT approves the resolution plan, it is executed and becomes legally binding on the corporate debtor and all parties. If the NCLT does not sanction the resolution plan or the CoC is unable to execute a resolution plan within the timeframe, the Tribunal may order the corporate debtor’s liquidation.
Developments:
- For the purpose of determining the impact of COVID -19 on the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016 we have to examine several stages of the proceedings. The govt of india proposed delaying the right to commence insolvency resolution proceedings under the IBC, 2016, for a period of six month because of the economic imbalance caused by pandemic Covid-19 Still the government passed the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (Amendment) Ordinace,2020 which came into existence on June 5, 2020.The constitution revised the section66 Section 66 of the IBC along with a new section 10A (16) (Suspension of Initiation of corporate Insolvency Resolution Process) ( Fraudulent Trading or Wrongful Trading).
suggestions and Conclusions:
- Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code is important for the purpose of country’s insolvency regulations to be implemented as a blanket legistation. As a law Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code is newly enacted which is continually being developed, it is important to study the changes along with court judgements for appreciating the complexities. Corporate insolvency resolution process helps the creditors in recovering of their money and also looking out for the company’s best interests.
- To start the corporate insolvency resolution process under IBC code, Three persons will be specified who can initiate the process under the concerning applicable respective Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code sections. Although Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code is facing some challenges & shortcomings with the Code’s obligations which can be resolved via tribunals courts of National Company Law Tribunal. Comprehensive IBC law is being given to businesses and creditors.
- Interim insolvency professional is allowed by Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code to take over the administration of the company without the National Company Law Tribunal taking into account whether the debtor is better prepared to do so. The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code structure provides that when the insolvency professional assumes control, there are initiation problems or disincentives for initiating the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code resolution process.
Insolvency & Bankruptcy Consultants in Delhi :
Services in the field of Insolvency Laws
- Drafting of Insolvency Petition Under IBC
- Filing of your matter with National Company Law Tribunal Delhi
- Appearances by the Advocates & pleadings for the same
- Action for National Company Law Tribunal Final Order
- Recovery of Financial and Operational debt from the Debtors
- Recovery Of Operational and Financial Debt In Delhi via Insolvency
Popular blog:-
- Sale as Going concern under liquidation
- Liquidator fees to be paid CIRP Regulations
- Initiation of Liquidation under the IBC Code
- Liquidation Process for CD under IBC
- IBC Forms Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016 Forms Demand Notices Returns
**********************************************************
If this article has helped you in any way, i would appreciate if you could share/like it or leave a comment. Thank you for visiting my blog.
Legal Disclaimer:
The information / articles & any relies to the comments on this blog are provided purely for informational and educational purposes only & are purely based on my understanding / knowledge. They do noy constitute legal advice or legal opinions. The information / articles and any replies to the comments are intended but not promised or guaranteed to be current, complete, or up-to-date and should in no way be taken as a legal advice or an indication of future results. Therefore, i can not take any responsibility for the results or consequences of any attempt to use or adopt any of the information presented on this blog. You are advised not to act or rely on any information / articles contained without first seeking the advice of a practicing professional.