Overview about the partition of a Hindu Undivided Family:
Table of Contents
Overview about the partition of a Hindu Undivided Family:
Section 171 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 defines the partition of Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) and deals with the provisions of assessment after its partition. Section 171 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, is crucial for understanding the partition of a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) for taxation purposes in India. Related key points are mention here under:
- Section 171 provides the legal framework for the partition of an HUF. A partition involves the division of the assets and liabilities of the HUF among its members. After partition, the HUF ceases to exist as a single taxable entity. Instead, each member of the erstwhile HUF is treated as a separate taxpayer. This means that the income, assets, and liabilities allocated to each member are taxed in their individual capacity.
- The share of each member in the assets and liabilities of the HUF is determined at the time of partition. This determination is typically based on factors such as the ancestral property’s value, contributions made by each member, and any agreements among the members.
- Upon partition, any income earned or received by the HUF before the partition is assessed as the income of the HUF. However, any income earned or received after the partition is taxed in the hands of the respective members.
- It’s important to document the partition of the HUF to avoid any disputes or confusion regarding the allocation of assets and liabilities among the members. This documentation may include a partition deed or agreement signed by all members.
- Section 171 also addresses the treatment of assessments made on the HUF prior to its partition. Any assessments made before the partition will be binding on the HUF and its members, subject to any adjustments or modifications required due to the partition.
- Overall, Section 171 provides the necessary legal framework for the orderly partition of an HUF for taxation purposes, ensuring that the tax liabilities and assets are appropriately distributed among its members.
-
Distinguished from Hindu Law:
The Partition of Hindu Undivided Family should be recognized as per the Income Tax Act and not as per the Hindu Law. Section 6 of the Hindu Succession Act would govern the rights of the parties but insofar as income-tax law is concerned, the matter has to be governed by section 171(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. This section outlines the procedure for assessing the tax implications of an HUF’s partition, including the treatment of income, assets, and liabilities post-partition. However, it’s important to distinguish the treatment of HUF partition under income tax law from its treatment under Hindu law, particularly the Hindu Succession Act, 1956. Here’s how they differ:
Income Tax Act (Section 171):
- Governs the taxation aspects of HUF partition.
- Determines the tax liabilities of the HUF and its members post-partition.
- Establishes the procedure for assessing and taxing the income, assets, and liabilities of the HUF and its members after partition.
- Provides guidelines for the treatment of previous assessments and the allocation of tax liabilities among the members.
Hindu Law (Hindu Succession Act, 1956):
- Governs the personal and property rights of individuals within an HUF.
- Determines the rights of members in ancestral property, including their share upon partition.
- Provides rules for succession, inheritance, and ownership of property among family members.
- Establishes the legal framework for partition of the HUF’s assets and liabilities among its members, including the rights and obligations of each member.
While both the Income Tax Act and Hindu law address the partition of HUFs, they serve different purposes and operate in distinct legal domains. The Income Tax Act focuses on tax implications and assessments, whereas Hindu law governs personal and property rights within the family. It’s essential to consider both sets of laws when dealing with the partition of an HUF to ensure compliance with legal requirements and fair distribution of assets and liabilities among its members.
-
Partial partition:
Tax Laws do not recognize partial partition of property or/and persons after 30.03.1978 on insertion of sub-section (9) to Section 171 of the Income Tax Act. This restriction was put to avoid creation of multiple HUFs which was a misuse. The concept of partial partition in Hindu Undivided Families (HUFs) under tax laws underwent significant changes with the insertion of subsection (9) to Section 171 of the Income Tax Act. Here’s a breakdown:
-
- Partial partition refers to the division of only some of the assets or members of an HUF, leaving the rest undivided. Before the amendment, partial partition was recognized under tax laws.
- Subsection (9) of Section 171, inserted after 30th March 1978, brought about a significant change. It effectively disallowed the recognition of partial partition for tax purposes. This means that for tax assessment purposes, a partition must involve the complete division of all assets and members of the HUF.
- The amendment was introduced to curb potential misuse of the provision. Prior to this change, there were instances where multiple HUFs were created through partial partitions to avail of tax benefits or to split income among family members in a manner that might not reflect the true economic realities of the family.
- With the disallowance of partial partition, any division of assets or members within an HUF for tax purposes must result in a complete partition, where all assets and liabilities are divided among the members, and each member becomes a separate taxpayer.
- It’s important for taxpayers to be aware of this provision to ensure compliance with tax laws. Any attempt to undertake a partial partition for tax benefits could lead to adverse consequences, including potential tax implications or challenges from tax authorities.
By disallowing partial partitions, tax laws aim to ensure fairness and transparency in the taxation of HUFs, discouraging practices that might lead to tax avoidance or evasion.
-
Distribution of assets at the time of partition of Hindu Undivided Family
- On a full partition of the assets of a Hindu Undivided Family, all the coparceners get their shares in the property. The amendment to Section 6 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, in 2005 brought significant changes to the rights of daughters in Hindu Undivided Families (HUFs). Here’s how it impacted the distribution of assets at the time of partition:
- Overall, the amendment to Section 6 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, played a crucial role in ensuring equal rights for daughters in HUF property, leading to a more equitable distribution of assets at the time of partition. After the amendment in 2005, of Section 6 of Hindu Succession Act, 1956, daughters are also made coparceners and their rights are equal to those of the sons and therefore sons and daughters get the same share in the Hindu Undivided Family property on partition.
- Before the 2005 amendment, daughters did not have equal rights as sons in HUF property. However, after the amendment, daughters were granted coparcenary rights, making them equal coparceners along with sons.
- Coparcenary refers to the joint ownership of property by the male members of an HUF, known as coparceners. With the amendment, daughters became coparceners by birth, just like sons. This means they have the same rights and liabilities in the HUF property as sons.
- As a result of the amendment, both sons and daughters are entitled to an equal share in the HUF property upon partition. This ensures gender equality and eliminates the previous disparity in property rights between sons and daughters.
- Upon a full partition of the HUF assets, all coparceners, including sons and daughters, receive their respective shares in the property. The shares are determined based on factors such as the value of the assets, contributions made by each coparcener, and any agreements among the family members.
- The 2005 amendment not only brought about a significant change in the rights of daughters but also provided legal recognition to the principle of gender equality in matters of inheritance and property rights within HUFs.
-
Physical division by metes and bounds is necessary
According to the Explanation to Section 171 of the Income Tax Act, a partition may involve a physical division of the property if it’s feasible. This means that if the property can be physically divided into distinct portions, each coparcener may receive their share of the property as per their entitlement.Hindu Law does not require division of joint family property physically or by metes and bounds.
If the property does not allow for physical division due to its nature or characteristics, then the division should be done in a manner that the property allows. This could include other forms of division such as assigning different portions or assets to different coparceners based on their entitlement. However, partition as defined under Explanation to Section 171 of the Act means—
(i) where the property admits of a physical division, a physical division of the property, but a physical division of the income without a physical division of the property producing the income shall not be deemed to be a partition; or
(ii) where the property does not admit of a physical division, then such division as the property admits of but a mere severance of status shall not be deemed to be a partition. It’s also specified that a mere severance of status, without an actual division of the property, is not considered a partition for tax purposes. This means that simply declaring an intention to separate or to live separately is not sufficient to constitute a partition under the Income Tax Act.
Overall, while Hindu law may not require physical division by metes and bounds, the Income Tax Act has specific criteria for what constitutes a partition for tax purposes, emphasizing the actual division of the property or assets among the coparceners
- Partition of Hindu Undivided Family property can be done either through family settlement or through a partition deed, Partition of Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) property can indeed be done through either a family settlement or a partition deed, each with its own legal implications:
Family Settlement:
- A family settlement is an agreement among the members of the HUF to divide the family property among themselves.
- It can be done orally or in writing and does not necessarily require a formal document.
- Family settlements are generally based on mutual understanding and consent among the family members.
- Unlike a partition deed, a family settlement does not attract stamp duty, and registration is not mandatory.
Partition Deed:
- A partition deed is a formal legal document that outlines the division of HUF property among its members.
- It must be executed in writing and signed by all the adult members of the HUF.
- A partition deed is subject to stamp duty, which varies depending on the value of the property being divided and the applicable state laws.
- Registration of the partition deed is mandatory under the Registration Act, 1908, to make it legally valid and enforceable. Registration provides a higher level of legal certainty and serves as evidence of the division of property.
Both methods of partition—family settlement and partition deed—have their own advantages and considerations. Family settlements are more flexible and informal but may lack legal enforceability in case of disputes. On the other hand, partition deeds provide a formal and legally binding arrangement but involve the payment of stamp duty and registration fees. The choice between the two methods depends on the preferences and circumstances of the family members involved.
-
Procedures for recognition of partition
The procedure by which the partition gets its recognition are as follows:—
- Hindu Undivided Family, which has been hitherto assessed, must make a claim to the assessing officer that the HUF properties have been subjected to total partition.
- HUF, which has been previously assessed for tax purposes, must submit a claim to the assessing officer stating that the properties of the HUF have undergone a total partition. This claim serves as the initial request for recognition of the partition.
- Upon receiving the claim, the assessing officer will initiate an inquiry into the partition claim. This inquiry involves examining the evidence provided by the HUF and may also include gathering additional information or documentation related to the partition.
- As part of the inquiry process, the assessing officer will issue notices to all members of the HUF, informing them about the claim of partition and the impending inquiry. This allows all members to present their views or provide any relevant information regarding the partition.
- Then, the Assessing Officer will make an inquiry into the claim after giving notice to all members of the HUF; and
- The assessing officer will carefully review all the evidence, documents, and statements provided by the HUF members during the inquiry process. The officer may also conduct interviews or discussions with the members to gather further details about the partition.
- If the assessing officer is satisfied with the evidence presented and is convinced that a total partition of the HUF has indeed occurred, they will record a finding to that effect. This finding will state that there was a total partition of the HUF and will specify the date on which the partition took place.
- if he is satisfied that the claim is correct, then, he will record a finding that there was a total partition of the HUF, and he will also mention the date on which it has taken place.
- Once the assessing officer records the finding of partition, the HUF will cease to exist as a single taxable entity for income tax purposes. Instead, the individual members of the erstwhile HUF will be assessed separately for their respective shares of income and assets post-partition.
- Overall, the recognition of partition involves a formal process of inquiry and evaluation by the assessing officer to ensure the genuineness and legality of the partition claim made by the HUF.
-
Order u/s 171 not applicable where an Hindu Undivided Family has not been assessed to tax
In the Matter CIT v. Hari Krishnan Gupta (2001) – The wordings of section 171 show that the section has no application to an Hindu Undivided Family, which has not been hitherto assessed. In the case you mentioned, CIT v. Hari Krishnan Gupta (2001), it was held that Section 171 does not apply to a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) that has not been previously assessed to tax. Section 171 of the Income Tax Act pertains to “penalty for concealment of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars of income.” The interpretation provided in the case suggests that this section does not extend to Hindu Undivided Families that have not been assessed previously.
-
Partition is not a transfer
- Distribution of the assets of an Hindu Undivided Family in the course of partition, would not attract any capital gains tax liability as it does not involve a transfer. A partition of assets within a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) is not considered a transfer for the purpose of capital gains tax. This means that when assets are distributed among the members of an HUF during a partition, there is no capital gains tax liability incurred by the family members.
- There would be no clubbing of incomes under section 64 of the Income Tax Act as it would not involve any direct or indirect transfer. Additionally, since there is no transfer involved in a partition, there would be no clubbing of incomes under Section 64 of the Income Tax Act. Section 64 deals with the clubbing of income in certain cases where income is transferred directly or indirectly to a spouse, minor child, or other specified relatives.
**********************************************************
If this article has helped you in any way, i would appreciate if you could share/like it or leave a comment. Thank you for visiting my blog.
Legal Disclaimer:
The information / articles & any relies to the comments on this blog are provided purely for informational and educational purposes only & are purely based on my understanding / knowledge. They do noy constitute legal advice or legal opinions. The information / articles and any replies to the comments are intended but not promised or guaranteed to be current, complete, or up-to-date and should in no way be taken as a legal advice or an indication of future results. Therefore, i can not take any responsibility for the results or consequences of any attempt to use or adopt any of the information presented on this blog. You are advised not to act or rely on any information / articles contained without first seeking the advice of a practicing professional.